![]()
| #27. Posted at 10:36 AM on Jul 25th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
shank15217 |
As the process matures, the power envelop will drop. Look at the power consumption differences of the newer Phenom 9950 and 9850. Anandtech showed that the newer Phenom consumes less power even though it has a higher TDP.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Joel H. |
Data8504,
IPC performance should increase modestly compared to Phenom, thanks to larger cache sizes and the various efficiency tweaks AMD has said it will introduce. |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
maroon1 |
So, 45nm Phenom will compete with the G0 stepping 65nm processors from Intel in terms of power consumption ?!
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
L1veSkull |
Anyone else catch this? From the second page " Power-saving 12% AMD 45 nano-four nuclear power the world's first test"
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ish718 |
How about performance improvements? Their acting like power consumption is the main concern.
I wanna see some gaming benchmarks GODDAMIT! |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
data8504 |
Is the 45nm rev just a dumb shrink, or can we expect any improvement in per-clock performance? If no improvements are planned, I don't even think a 3.4 GHz Phenom's going to do the dew.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
pikaporeon |
Where did they find a quad core thats only 40C under -load-?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
burntham77 |
24W drop at full load vs the 65nm Phenoms? Sold!
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |