68 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #57. Posted at 10:28 AM on Aug 14th 2008 Edit   Reply

It's as if there has been a conscious campaign around the TR offices to increase the humor in their news posts. I think it's great, has anyone else noticed a trend?
collapse

   #17. Posted at 05:10 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

"Of course, given how eSATA is quickly becoming the weapon of choice for external storage solutions, one has to wonder whether we needed the extra bandwidth or not."

eSata is not taking over anything. Besides enthusiast boards where else do you see eSATA ports? People also forget one HUGE advantage of USB, the fact that its been around in one shape or another and will likely continue to be for quiet some time. I can't begin to describe how frustrating it is when you find some piece of useful scientific equipment and its no longer possible to hook it into a modern computer because it uses some outdated/proprietary connection. One port please for generic equipment.
collapse

   #44. Posted at 11:12 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

USB 3.0 = meh until there are peripherals that *need* more bandwidth then what USB 2.0 can provide.
collapse

   #59. Posted at 11:07 AM on Aug 14th 2008, Edited at 01:03 PM on Aug 14th 2008 Edit   Reply

Am I the only one that thinks the slant of this article is a little misleading? Intel never said 'we are keeping USB 3.0 proprietary or on a licensing model' they just said that the spec was not ready to be released.
collapse
#59, *bump*  :   (#62)  «

   #56. Posted at 09:45 AM on Aug 14th 2008 Edit   Reply

Is this Damage's pseudonym?
collapse

   #14. Posted at 04:38 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Can I ask the specification to specify a connector that doesn't ALMOST fit in upside down?

Whoever came up with the current USB connector needs to be shot.
collapse

   #3. Posted at 03:54 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

SuperSpeed is a horrible name.
collapse
#3, SpeedySpeed  :   (#6)  «

   #31. Posted at 07:57 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'm pretty sure USB 5.0 will be called 'UberSuperDuperSpeed'.

And it still won't be as fast as Firewire 400 for things like harddrives. :)
collapse

   #1. Posted at 03:50 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

unforks? sillypants?
collapse

   #32. Posted at 08:00 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

I'd be rejoicing if USB became Firewire.
collapse

   #39. Posted at 10:12 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Reply to #29

USB 3.0 will be dubbed OMGUberSpeed USB
collapse

   #26. Posted at 06:47 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

#22 - RAID 6, man, RAID 6. Or RAID 10.
collapse

   #2. Posted at 03:51 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Well those mice will have "future prediction" engines that can see things before they happen. It's a lot of data to transmit back and forth, though.
collapse

   #15. Posted at 04:51 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Dude, the extra bandwidth of SuperDuperSpeed USB *obviously* isn't intended for simply a single gaming mouse; it's for when you have a *RAID array* of gaming mice that you'll see the bandwidth gains. Get with the times, man.
collapse

   #13. Posted at 04:32 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

Firewire FTW !

Adi
collapse

   #7. Posted at 04:08 PM on Aug 13th 2008 Edit   Reply

SuperSpeed port FTW!
collapse
68 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q