![]()
| #6. Posted at 04:02 PM on Aug 26th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
KamikaseRider |
I don't think nano needs a new design it's just so good right now..
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ClickClick5 |
Aw. What I want is a holographic iPod. One that can be flicked and the "screen" is displayed hovering above the device. Like on Star Wars or Spy Kids...
Suck on that Microsoft! lol |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
A_Pickle |
Apple would price new iPods lower "to distance [them] from the $199 iPhone."
Oh, great. So now they'll... still have fewer features than most of the MP3 players on the market, but instead of costing MORE, they'll be the same price? Awesome. ...aaaaand stupid people will still flock to them to maintain their edge in the latest hipster/indie/emo technology. Fantastic. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
UberGerbil |
Somebody link the SNL "Weekend Update" bit where fake Steve Jobs makes the new, ever-smaller iPods obsolete just seconds after introducing them....
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ssidbroadcast |
Er, "narrower" might be a more appropriate adjective. I've held a current-gen nano in my hands and... its gotta be against the laws of physics to make that thing any thinner.
Not that I was crazy about the design; a wide zippo-like profile? Unattractive. Plus, that coverflow is too much for such meager hardware to handle. |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |