22 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #21. Posted at 01:26 PM on Sep 26th 2008 Edit   Reply

E5200 = 85 of your american dollars
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116072

You can get it up to 4ghz easy. I'll post some screens today, I woulda done it yesterday but i was falling asleep at my desk.
collapse

   #19. Posted at 08:21 AM on Sep 24th 2008 Edit   Reply

tbh even at the lower dual-core end, i don't see how AMD can compete. especially with the launch of the super cheap e7400 inherent, which seems to be quite the overclocking beast.
collapse

   #16. Posted at 06:24 AM on Sep 24th 2008 Edit   Reply

Well the Athlon X2s will run out, and AMD will need a low-end product that's cheap to manufacture. So they can use their old 65nm lines to produce cheap, low-end dual-core Phenoms (with and without L3 cache). Of course at some point they will move to 45nm across the board and that will result in either lower power low-end chips, and/or faster low-end chips.
collapse

   #10. Posted at 05:28 PM on Sep 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Cyril: ....45nm Phenoms mere months away.

Got your hands on a 45nm Phenom Quad to 'unofficially' benchmark yet?? The desktop Nehalem Quad has been 'unofficially' benchmarked many, many times and it supposedly is due to come out after AMD's AM2+ 45nm offerings......

The AMD 45nm release scenario reminds me of those movies that are released where the movie critics are not allowed to preview.........
collapse

   #15. Posted at 09:36 PM on Sep 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

[URL="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://www.salland.eu/category/gallery/467/socket-am2.html& sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result& prev=/search%3Fq%3D65674%2BAMD%2BAthlon64%2BX2%2B6500%252B%2BBlack%2BEdition%2B2.30%2BGHz,%2B2x%2B512kB%2B,%2BBoxed%26... /URL] ....a guy bought it from another forum (XS) and said he will post when he gets it with images etc.. so we'll see if it exist then...
collapse

   #6. Posted at 03:25 PM on Sep 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

It's noteworthy when a newer-generation chip is faster than its predecessor?

DAAMIT is in some deep doodoo.
collapse

   #1. Posted at 02:33 PM on Sep 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

What really perplexes me about that processor is that it's just 2.3 GHz. What in the world is it? A quad core that came out so bad, they had to disable two cores? And yet, it is a "black edition," suggesting that there is more in mind for it than it just being a random OEM part, like how the tri-cores came into being.
collapse

   #3. Posted at 03:15 PM on Sep 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Didn't TR do a clock for clock comparison between X4 (downgraded via OS to 2x cores) against an AMD dual core? The gains were ~10-15%, clock for clock, right?
collapse

   #2. Posted at 03:07 PM on Sep 23rd 2008, Edited at 03:08 PM on Sep 23rd 2008 Edit   Reply

Honestly, at the price point that these would be sold at, i don't think it will make much of a difference. At that point hardly anyone is paying attention to performance, and AMD still has a ton of Athlons to sell.

I can see them saving the dual core Phenoms until all of the Athlons are gone. Hell, even then they might just drop the tri-core Phenoms into thier place (which i'd like to see).
collapse
22 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q