![]()
| #1. Posted at 11:33 AM on Oct 1st 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
marvelous |
In a small form factor I guess this makes sense but why?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
mattthemuppet |
I just bought a WD6400AACS Green Power drive by accident - didn't even know it existed until I walked out of the shop with it :) Haven't installed it yet, but given how little power the 1TB GP drive draws, this should use very little power and make next to no noise.
Considering how old the drive is that it's replacing, I doubt I'd notice any difference in performance between this and a WD6400AAKS - both would be jaw dropping in comparison! |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Steel |
I noticed a new Samsung 5400RPM 1TB drive on Newegg today that sells for $10 less than the current WD GP drive. Would be interesting to see how it compares performance wise with the WD drives.
Link for those who are interested: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152135 |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
MadManOriginal |
At least we'll be able to clearly tell the difference based on specs with the larger cache unlike in the past when updated drives were impossible to discern on a website that only lists the basic model number.
As for price, on WD's website the current price for a retail kit of the 16MB cache version is also 219.99. So the price noted here will probably be meaningless as far as a street price as well and anything above $140-150 would be really hard to justify when the Seagate 1.5TB is at $190. |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |