52 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #26. Posted at 07:47 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
Usacomp2k3
Once again, slow on the new DDR train.
collapse
#26, Smartly stepping on board at about the point where the DDR3 ...  :  UberGerbil  (#29)  «
#26, Agreed. Since AM3 Phenoms won't arrive till 2010, it looks a...  :  mutarasector  (#52)  «

   #36. Posted at 04:29 AM on Nov 14th 2008, Edited at 04:39 AM on Nov 14th 2008 Edit   Reply
maroon1
So, AMD will make the fisrt 32nm processor on 2011 ?!! As far as I know Intel will make 32nm Nehalem on late 2009 !

Based on this roadmap, I can say that Intel will kick AMD's ass for a long long time. Thats if we assume that AMD release their products on time. If delay their products again as they always do, then we need to say bye bye to AMD
collapse
#36, This is not surprising. Intel always had the more advanced f...  :  sdack  (#38)  «
#38, well thy must stay a far leap ahead now when ther're the ...  :  xastware  (#46)  «
#46, Heh, this reminds me of the time when I smoked my firs...  :  sdack  (#49)  «
#49, LOL that was pretty good ;)  :  kitsunegari  (#51)  «

   #20. Posted at 05:41 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
AMDisDEC
2011 is a looooong way off for AMD
collapse
#20, Not now when they get rid of their own fab that was mainly u...  :  xastware  (#47)  «
#47, 1) proofread your posts before posting them 2) The europea...  :  ztrand  (#50)  «

   #14. Posted at 03:36 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
jdaven
Another question: According to Anandtech's pictures of AMD's slides, 32 nm will be ready for production in 2010 but there are not products scheduled for 2011. What are they going to do? Sit on that 32 nm technology for a whole year. I think there is more in the 2009/2010 (dual cores, 32 nm transition) than the overly simplified roadmap shows.
collapse
#14, Hmmm, for the last couple of transistions (90nm, 65nm, 45nm),...  :  LiamC  (#18)  «
#18, well you misinterprets the facts, all of them have testin...  :  xastware  (#48)  «

   #2. Posted at 02:03 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
srg86
According to Anandtech, the 45nm Phenom, is going to be called the Phenom II.
collapse
#2, That would suck. AMD, Intel, and Nvidia should all defer to ...  :  flip-mode  (#7)  «
#7, I always prefered when chips were numbered (80386, 80486,...  :  srg86  (#8)  «
#7, AMD, Intel, and Nvidia should all defer to me concerning ...  :  ssidbroadcast  (#30)  «
#7, I see nothing wrong with phenom 2 x4, its simple and it a...  :  ish718  (#32)  «
#32, I guess a Phenom 2x4 might be AMD's best bet for respo...  :  ludi  (#35)  «
#2, AMD Phenom FX II X4 30550 OverNineThousand Edition.  :  Meadows  (#16)  «
#16, Ampsquared, that is.  :  grantmeaname  (#28)  «
#16, this will get yet another mysterious X in it's name Phobo...  :  xastware  (#45)  «

   #3. Posted at 02:04 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
Game_boy
Deneb vs. 32nm Nehalem? That'll be painful.

Also, no Fusion products to fight 2010 Larrabee...
collapse
#3, If Intel's past GPUs have been any indication... Larrabee wi...  :  Preyfar  (#12)  «
#12, I really can't see Intel being like that with an descrete...  :  srg86  (#15)  «
#12, It won't be like their IGPs. Intel has a completely diffe...  :  stmok  (#33)  «
#33, well that's probably cause lara-stinky-bee is not a gr...  :  xastware  (#44)  «
#3, Why would AMD's Fusion stuff compete against Larrabee? One i...  :  The Dark One  (#13)  «

   #37. Posted at 06:38 AM on Nov 14th 2008 Edit   Reply
Jigar
AMD's Fusion has become a big Con-Fusion...
collapse
#37, while it's run under con-artists initiative it's not so surp...  :  xastware  (#43)  «

   #19. Posted at 05:28 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
Chillectric
I hope they introduce SSE5 sooner, then
collapse
#19, They're flying in the face of Intel's AVX with that. And, ba...  :  UberGerbil  (#21)  «
#21, I only took issue with that one i7 quote; I'm not going t...  :  Scrotos  (#42)  «

   #41. Posted at 10:28 AM on Nov 14th 2008 Edit   Reply
rivieracadman
This entire roadmap speaks of rebuilding and solidifying AMDs' market share. I'm glad they held off Fusion until it's solid, and cost effective to produce. Focus on recovering your core markets first, and build your best products over time behind closed doors. There are several successful buisnesses that follow this model. ( Apple for one )
collapse

   #39. Posted at 07:55 AM on Nov 14th 2008 Edit   Reply
snowboard9
Wow. Another roadmap change from AMD !

I'm starting to worry when they change roadmaps as frequently as I do my laundry,
collapse
#39, gotta do something with all of the dirty underwear.  :  eitje  (#40)  «

   #34. Posted at 11:31 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
stmok
I don't mind this roadmap...I'm not upgrading until 2011 anyway! :-D
collapse

   #24. Posted at 06:49 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
ludi
Duke Fusion Forever.
collapse
#24, come get some?  :  ssidbroadcast  (#31)  «

   #6. Posted at 02:27 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
UberGerbil
Completely trivial and content-free aside, but:
Anybody see any coherence to AMD's codenames (akin to the F1 tracks on the server side)? I realize they're probably coming from different groups and maybe only have some internal rationale within those groups, but I'm not really even seeing evidence of that.

Lakes: Geneva, Champlain, Ontario, and Caspian (sort of)
Towns: Liano (Italy), Conesus (NY)
Snake/dragon/mythical thing: Orochi
Propos -- apropos...nothing?
collapse
#6, I am pretty sure it is Llano, here in Texas... http://www.lla...  :  Xylker  (#9)  «
#9, That sounds plausible. And looking at that slide carefull...  :  UberGerbil  (#22)  «
#22, Most of the names in this area of the country are butc...  :  Xylker  (#25)  «
#25, In northern Ohio, there's a Lima pronounced Lye-ma ...  :  grantmeaname  (#27)  «
#6, I believe you mean AMD's Propus? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki...  :  Meadows  (#23)  «

   #17. Posted at 04:11 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
Vasilyfav
So AMD won't be able to catch up on the tech process like the news said they will by the end of 2009. Why am I not surprised in the least?
collapse

   #11. Posted at 03:28 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
jdaven
So are 2 Core Deneb processors for the desktop completely canceled?
collapse

   #10. Posted at 03:02 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
slaimus
This is probably a result of the fab spin-off plan. The fab division will not have ability to make GPUs until 32nm when it is bulk silicon. Maybe the Strike platform was going to be made at TSMC with SOI, but now that AMD fab and TSMC are competitors, the deal was off.
collapse

   #5. Posted at 02:13 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
ApockofFork
This is a very different strategy from Intel's tick tock technique. At 32nm AMD is going to revamp its architechture significantly and probably end up shooting itself in the foot doing so. I wish them the best but this isn't a stellar roadmap to compete against intel's. Having bought two AMD computers in the past 6 months though(after considering intel options) I think they could still pull something together.
collapse

   #4. Posted at 02:12 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
Staypuft
I'm really surprised AMD isn't doing a 32 nm shrink of Deneb before it launches Bulldozer. Debuting a new process tech and a new architecture in one release seems like trouble. There's pretty much all chip manufactures stagger those upgrades.
collapse

   #1. Posted at 01:32 PM on Nov 13th 2008 Edit   Reply
bfellow
Delays from AMD? That's unheard of!
collapse
52 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q