Comments for: Nvidia intros a cheaper GT200-derived Quadro FX

#8. Posted at 04:44 PM on Dec 2nd 2008

Edit Reply

ScythedBlade

Why the hell are workstation graphics car always more expensive and suckier?

#8, Because they are low-volume runs of cards that offer feature... : ludi (#9) «

#9, The cliff notes version is that they're using it to make ... : OneArmedScissor (#10) «

#10, Even though i am not using it to make money.... god i ... : moose17145 (#11) «

#11, get a job in broadcast graphics; we have a quadro f... : lycium (#14) «

#14, You don't need an actual job actually. Some coll... : Silus (#16) «

#13. Posted at 04:49 AM on Dec 3rd 2008

Edit Reply

Dagwood

So what if you have CAD software and "mainstream" graphics card? Does the CAD program refuse to use the 3D funtions of the something like a Geforce 9600GT?

#13, It's mostly about driver support. They are optimized for tho... : Silus (#15) «

#12. Posted at 10:18 PM on Dec 2nd 2008

Edit Reply

pogsnet

The only difference with the GTX version is the driver it uses. Nvidia software is much costly than M$ can offer.

#2. Posted at 03:00 PM on Dec 2nd 2008

Edit Reply

_Sigma

Are there any benchmarks comparing these to their desktop brethren in games, etc?

#2, OMG!!! This is a workstation graphics card. : jdaven (#4) «

#2, Uhm, why? For the price of one of these, you can have two GT... : ludi (#6) «

#2, I will give you the spoiler. This performs slower. And no...... : moose17145 (#7) «

#1. Posted at 02:44 PM on Dec 2nd 2008, Edited at 04:43 PM on Dec 2nd 2008

Edit Reply

sdack

Any nickname yet? I suggest "Moby Dick".

#1, It is white and a big large, yes. : bthylafh (#3) «

#1, Another one is "Walkie Talkie". If you show it to anyone on ... : sdack (#5) «