![]()
| #31. Posted at 11:31 PM on May 20th 2009 | Edit Reply |
|
Xenolith |
When will this thing be shipped. Love to play with one.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Captain Ned |
O fortuna
velat luna statu variabilis |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
pullmyfoot |
I completely support VIA :) I hope they take the low end low power market by storm with something spectacular as their next chip. Stupid Intel. I cant stand them
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
FuturePastNow |
So it's a really cheap blade server?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
akurtzhs |
Some Atoms do come with VT-x, just not all of them.
Unfortunately, no Atoms come with both 64 bit and VT-x support. http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=29035 has the details - 330 and 230 are 64-bit capable, some of the more high-end Z series are VT-x enabled. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
UberGerbil |
I wonder who the large customer was that persuaded Dell to do this?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Ethyriel |
Hell yeah, man, I would drop $600 or $700 on one for the chance to play with some clustering. I know I could just use old systems, but this would be so compact and out of the way.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
oMa |
WOHOOO! I love underdogs! Many think of me as a fanboy, but GO AMD, VIA, ATI and Nvidia(<-under doubt)!
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
eitje |
I'd point out that VIA's Padlock also gives you some pretty sweet performance on encrypted data (such as what you'd see with SSL).
also: how excited am I, for Via! rah rah rah! |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ssidbroadcast |
although the system will only be available "through a special group within Dell that creates custom hardware for large customers."
adding, "So that we don't piss off They-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named." |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |