![]()
| #6. Posted at 07:05 AM on Jul 6th 2009 | Edit Reply |
|
henfactor |
I find it funny how all the Vista haters are saying W7 is going to be so much better, when in fact the two aren't that much different!
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
oldDummy |
Windows 7 will be welcomed when it gets to retail.
It is tough to use a beta OS on a primary computer. When any problems happen anything beta is the first thing I remove. So while I had all intentions of giving the beta a good workout, within a few weeks Vista was back. First impressions were favorable, I liked it. Don't care for IE8 but have yet to find a suitable replacement. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Decelerate |
TRIM support comes out-of-the-box for Win7?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
gtoulouzas |
Can't wait for TRIM support and the corresponding hardware releases and firmware updates from SSD manufacturers.
Other than that, I don't see anything particularly impressive about the forthcoming release... |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
barich |
Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to #5.
Firefox is absolutely not more secure than IE8. Firefox has had many more reported vulnerabilities, and it does not run in a sandbox like IE8 does on Vista/7. Chrome is similarly secure to IE8, as it also runs in a sandbox and has had a similar number of reported vulnerabilities. Firefox might be safer than IE, because it is targeted less than IE, similar to how Mac OS X is safer than Windows despite having many more reported vulnerabilities. Personally, I don't leave my security in the hands of the malware developers, and prefer to actually use a secure product. |
![]()
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |