![]()
| #45. Posted at 08:44 PM on Jul 10th 2009 | Edit Reply |
|
ub3r |
tfeh!!!!!!
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Wintermane |
The 220 definetly could play fallout 3 very well also sacred 2 and quite a few other titles. Heck even the 210 could play fallout 3.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Silus |
What still puzzles me is G210. Based off GT200 and with 16 processors doesn't seem possible. 24 SPs would be more likely.
GT 220 seems to be what ION 2 will be based upon. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
RagingDragon |
doh. was supposed to be a reply to another post.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
spworley |
One subtle point for CUDA programmers... these are the first single slot cards that have compute model > 1.1. This means many CUDA operations are a lot more efficient (memory coalescing especially) than on older G90 cards. These are compute model 1.2 which means they don't have native double precision support though... that's model 1.3 and reserved for the double-slot G200 cards.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Silus |
ION 2 will probably be based off this GT 220. It certainly fits the rumors about it.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
fpsduck |
This might be crazy
but they should have 2 skus for low profile card (the long one) and the shorter card. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
sativa |
Actually these cards will be pretty good for Windows 7+aero. I noticed that the window-preview on the task bar doesn't last long on systems with little graphics memory. Is Windows using the graphics card to store that info? If so, cheaper cards with more RAM would make sense.
For a business/non-gamer machine, I want a card that is - cheap, - low power, - quiet (preferably fanless), - easily handles Aero, - supports dual hdmi/dvi, - can relieve the cpu a little from full screen hd video In fact, since I mainly game on console's now, I would like this for my home computer too! |
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Kurotetsu |
I was looking at an HP system that was on sale and these cards came up as a customization option under Graphics:
http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/computer_series.do?store...e=computer_store&category=desktops&series_name=p...[] At the time I had no idea what the G210 or GT 120 were supposed to be, and I ALMOST fell for the '1GB of onboard memory for the AWESOME!' ploy. That is, until I figured that if its ONLY $60 more than friggin' Intel graphics than it can't be that much better. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Vasilyfav |
They look incredibly weak. Here's to hoping that big manufacturers don't market them as 'awesome discrete graphics' (hint: they will anyway)
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
juampa_valve_rde |
definitively this 2 dont aim to the radeon hd 4770...
maybe at the 4670 and 4550 |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
SiUnit |
It looks like they have finally had some success with smaller chips in a smaller process, hopefully they can translate this to more complex designs i.e. the upcoming GT300 series.
Plus, these have to be better than integrated Intel solutions, right? |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Schwarzsturm |
There's something very important missing, namely the lack of an SLI connector...
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Schwarzsturm |
There's something very important missing to these new additions, namely the SLI connector...
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Game_boy |
I would ignore when Nvidia says they're launched and wait for the first products to appear. Nvidia's 40nm mobile GPUs turned up in real products yet? No.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
henfactor |
At least they're better than what usually ship with OEM's.
The problem the arises with these is the Best Buy sales guy will say "And this computer has a discrete nvidia graphics, perfect for gaming". Then people will go home and wonder why games look like slide shows. |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |