![]()
| #8. Posted at 04:01 PM on Aug 16th 2004 | Edit Reply |
|
Occupant |
If they make a chipset for SLI, they should put 48 PCI-E lanes into the chipset, -at least 48- to allow for other high speed devices....
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Captain AMD |
Damn, I'm still waiting to see how they are going to manage the power requirements with 2 of those hogs in a single rig.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Namarrgon |
Is it necessary for nVidia to provide explicit support for a second gfx slot? Or is it just a matter of the mobo manufacturer routing some of the PCIe lanes that way?
It's already known that the nForce4 has 32 PCIe lanes. Take 16 for your primary slot plus 8 for the second (a la the existing Xeon chipset), and that still leaves enough for a couple of quite decent x4 slots to go with some legacy PCI and PCI-X slots. I saw (at AMD's SIGGRAPH stand) an Iwill dual Opteron board based on nForce4, with an x16 gfx slot and a single x4 slot (along with some PCI-X and PCI slots, not to mention 4 DIMM slots per CPU, direct-connected 4-way SATA RAID - and Soundstorm 2?) AFAIK it would be no great difficulty to change a couple of PCI-X slots for an x8 and an x4 slot, thus providing my dream mobo... |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Usacomp2k3 |
it's the same 'ole dually debate the has always been there
2xslower opterons or 1 faster p4 i still say stick with the faster single component |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |