Comments for: NVIDIA confirms AGP version of GeForce 6200

#2. Posted at 06:24 PM on Jan 17th 2005

Edit Reply

maxxcool

what i wanna know is are they going to leave it at 32/64 megs onboard.. or are firms gonna bridge it and have a "second level" ram cache it thinks is a local pci-e frame buffer..

maxx

#2, This is not the TurboCached 6200.. it will have 128MB or 256... : thebluesgnr (#4) «

#2, Methinks they are not going to use the Turbo Cache version, ... : DreadCthulhu (#5) «

#5, /nods/ then it may be a viable LE solution then... :) : maxxcool (#10) «

#1. Posted at 03:47 PM on Jan 17th 2005

Edit Reply

Hizpanick

Another contender for the low end. FP!!!

#1, Now, if it's just in a low-profile format (like, oh, some of... : bhtooefr (#9) «

#6. Posted at 08:21 PM on Jan 17th 2005

Edit Reply

UberGerbil

I still think nVidia is missing a market opportunity by not doing an HDTV tuner + audio (soundstorm) card. They could even have "magic finger" connections to their videocards for HTPC apps. I mean, your typical SFF has one AGP and one PCI slot, right? Of course they could try to cram all of that onto a single video card but it seems like a stretch, and it's often easier to sell two things at $200 a piece than one thing at $400.

#6, If they could do it, they would only have to include one an ... : GodsMadClown (#7) «

#7, Not cool at all. Stay the F away from HDMI if you value y... : indeego (#8) «

#3. Posted at 07:20 PM on Jan 17th 2005

Edit Reply

Crayon Shin Chan

Thank lord! that FX5200 was the pits.