Comments for: Intel to move to common CPU architecture

#12. Posted at 01:05 PM on Aug 23rd 2005

Edit Reply

Decelerate

Are they telling us that they finally found their long-lost engineering department? ;-)

#5. Posted at 12:05 PM on Aug 23rd 2005

Edit Reply

blastdoor

What a letdown. No details at all? There's nothing here that we didn't know already -- Intel is going to move away from Netburst to something new, with better performance per watt. Big deal. This could be anything (well, except for the crazy VLIW speculation -- it's probably not that).

I hope something more clear emerges in the coming days. If it doesn't, then you really have to wonder what they're trying to hide. If they have some great new design that is demonstrably better than AMD's solution, then wouldn't they want to crow about it?

#5, Yeah but Intel always crows about it even when it isn't bett... : Convert (#6) «

#6, Well, it looks like the Inq claims to have some details: h... : blastdoor (#8) «

#8, Anyone up for axp price wars again? :) /wishful thinki... : Convert (#11) «

#5, It's the keynote address on the first day of the IDF. They'r... : UberGerbil (#7) «

#7, Maybe Intel should just give their chips to Apple in exch... : blastdoor (#9) «

#9, They don't have to -- they're going to get it for free... : UberGerbil (#10) «

#3. Posted at 11:53 AM on Aug 23rd 2005

Edit Reply

PenGun

Well they got the ship turned around and now they are firmly in AMD's wake. Notice how all this new architechture is really just what AMD has already done. Faster, smaller but nothing new at all.

PenGun

#3, Until there are more details there's nothing to support your... : UberGerbil (#4) «

#2. Posted at 11:48 AM on Aug 23rd 2005, Edited at 11:49 AM on Aug 23rd 2005

Edit Reply

m32001

*applaud*

I expected more details on exactly the new core will feature, but oh well..

#1. Posted at 11:24 AM on Aug 23rd 2005

Edit Reply

Convert

Woot.