![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
UberGerbil |
I'd like to see a review / comparison of the Maxtor MaXline III
The benches over at StorageReview (they don't have a review posted yet) make it look like the strongest 7200rpm SATA drive, and very close to the 74GB Raptor in many tests. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Skip |
>>> see how the Caviar RE2 stacks up
Last week I put 2 Caviar RE2s into a dual PowerMac G5 system. As in your tests, my benchmarks showed that the Western Digital 400GB performs about the same as my other drives. The big difference showed up when I configured RAID. It looks like the secret for maximizing drive performance is to use multiple drives with clever partitioning & RAID. I use RAID-1 (mirrors) for reliability, and RAID-0 (stripes) for speed. Below are my results. SoftRAID Striped 120GB 222 sec +/- 4 sec 78 GB/s SoftRAID Mirrored 300GB 325 sec +/- 2 sec 54 GB/s Apple's DiskUtility on Mirrored 300GB 424 sec 41 GB/s Apple's DiskUtility on 100 GB partition of the 400GB disk 435 sec +/- 1 sec 40 GB/s Apple's DiskUtility on 160 GB partition of the 160GB disk 413 sec +/- 1 sec 42 GB/s Skip Steuart 360s.com |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
d0g_p00p |
I too have the whine. I have 2 120GB JB's and I have been trying to make my pc more quiet over the years, the drives make the biggest noise. My plan is to replace them both with 200+ GB Seagate drives to get the noise level down.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
just brew it! |
Great review of what appears to be a nice drive!
It's a 4-platter design, eh? I suppose that's marginally better than Hitachi's large drives (which have 5 platters IIRC). I won't be buying any large drives any time soon; my recent exit from doing database consulting work means I've got an oversupply of spare hard drive space right now; deleting several 100+ GB databases from your system will tend to do that! :D It would be rather hard for me to justify buying a drive with this much space... though I'm sure it would be faster than what I've got. Re Western Digital whine: I agree, WD drives from 3+ years ago had a tendency to develop a truly mind-numbing whine after a few months. They seem to have this under control with their newer drives though, as they have finally moved to fluid dynamic bearings. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
albundy |
Man, those numbers are beyond pathetic. It just goes to show you that the hard drive market has really not put any real performance improvements beyond 1-10%. I wont even get into SCSI or SAS drives, but the Raptor did a number on this one.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ElderDruid |
Do they support hot-plug?
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
DrDillyBar |
Sweet. I'll take two platters please.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
indeego |
WD Raptors are at least 2 years old now. And they still are fairly untouchable. Amazing.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
z-man |
I am eyeballing these drives for new storage server. To replace my aging Proliant 3000 with 300GB.
I found several chassis that offer SATA hotswap and a 8 port RAID card for under 1k. Then all I need AMD MB, and some RAM, and a proc. Nothing fancy I don't need enterprise lvl preformance. Then I was going to slap in a bunch of RE drives ftw. Thinking 6, 250s for 1.25 TB. :D |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
blitzy |
dang that's a nice piece of drive, only issue for me would be having 400gb of data on a single drive is a lot to lose in one bang.... would need to be careful about backing up
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Prototyped |
Damn that's an impressive IOMeter showing. Considering that worstcase performance tends to matter more than shaving a fraction of a second off a game level load, this drive looks to be a winner.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Convert |
Dang, this gives the seagates a run for their money. I have always thought of WD to be a close second in terms of reliability (well except for the fact all of mine whine..) so I could see myself purchasing one.
A second dang goes out to the fact your opening statements made me think a new raptor-like drive was out. Someday eh? |
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |
In some cases the transaction rates on these disks can fall by as much as 90% in a rack environment. A decent disk like a Cheetah 15k does not have that problem.