25 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #13. Posted at 04:45 PM on Jan 16th 2006, Edited at 04:46 PM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

/me waits for someone to bring up the other perp thread discussion, about collusion and lack of competition in a market, so i can argue that this isn't all that strange that someone brings out their response to the tech within a while :-P,
-Mole
collapse

   #24. Posted at 09:55 AM on Jan 17th 2006 Edit   Reply

People keep wondering why we don't see larger (physical) drive with this technology. Besides the obvious newness of the coating process, the read-write heads probably also need to be improved. I remember when drives seemed 'stuck' at 6-8 Gig until GMR heads became standard.
Look at the current 15K RPM drives, they are still using lower density platters. Moving the same-sized bits faster is not the same as putting more bits into a smaller area, but the end result is the same.
collapse

   #2. Posted at 08:29 AM on Jan 16th 2006, Edited at 08:30 AM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

Well, one way to raise transfer rate is to get higher densities, which perpendicular helps, but id rather prefer to have 7200rpm and higher densitet. Tiny bit of problem with laptops with heat and power though.

Still nice. Perhaps i'll get a decent HD when i finally upgrade to a decent laptop.
collapse

   #14. Posted at 05:44 PM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

Why wouldn't you want to 'get perpendicular'?

Wonder when they'll start stacking bits and using hardware level compression, is that even possible?

So many ways to change something that hasn't changed in so long...
collapse

   #17. Posted at 11:08 PM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

umm early adopters could be all the people with small stock ide drives on lower end laptops.

not all that many people have sata laptops, and they prolly arent in need of a new HD if they do.

maybe im wrong but it seems that way to me :-|
collapse

   #16. Posted at 08:58 PM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

Argh, me want solid state! Me want solid state!
collapse

   #10. Posted at 02:17 PM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

ALL of its hard drive products? Including the 3.5" Cheetah 10K RPM and 15K RPM SCSI/FC lines, and the Savvio 2.5" SAS lines?

How reliable is perpendicular recording tech right now? More importantly, how bad is a bad sector in perpendicular recording?
collapse

   #8. Posted at 11:45 AM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

It'd be nice to see how it performs against similar laptop hard drives. Just to give us an idication of how it might perform in a desktop once they start making 3.5" drives.
collapse

   #7. Posted at 11:25 AM on Jan 16th 2006, Edited at 11:26 AM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

I'm surprised Seagate was so far ahead of Hitachi getting the product out the door. The technology was invented by a prof at the Tohoku Institute of Technology, and I'd expect the Japanese companies to get the tech out way ahead of the US based companies.

Toshiba had a iPod sized drive out last year, and still are pushing .85 inch and 1.8 inch drives using it. But I haven't heard of any proposed laptop HD's, despite being a huge laptop HD supplier.
collapse

   #4. Posted at 08:59 AM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

collapse

   #3. Posted at 08:40 AM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

Now if only the Momentus was as quiet as WD's Scorpio...
collapse

   #1. Posted at 08:29 AM on Jan 16th 2006, Edited at 08:29 AM on Jan 16th 2006 Edit   Reply

collapse
25 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q