Comments for: Timeframe set for AMD/Intel antitrust trial

#10. Posted at 08:35 AM on Apr 21st 2006, Edited at 08:39 AM on Apr 21st 2006

Edit Reply

Vrock

#8, Until about 3 months ago, I saw that frequently. It's not that big of a deal, really. Nothing sexy about a chick struggling to take off a pair of paratrooper boots.

#10, Although implied, it doesn't necessarily mean a military uni... : Justice (#11) «

#3. Posted at 04:28 PM on Apr 20th 2006

Edit Reply

IntelMole

Awww, and there was me hoping for a trial that could be dramatised in a movie production lasting no longer than 90 mins.

Intel could be Jack Nicholson, and AMD could be Tom Cruise, Demi Moore (as I recall, damn she looked good in that film), and.... the other guys :-D

"You want answers!"
"I want the truth!"

"You can't handle the truth!"

Then, and only then, would I follow this trial :-D,
-Mole

#3, No truth-handler, you. Bah! I deride your truth-handling abi... : 5150 (#4) «

#4, You're starting to sound a bit like AMM. Which is creepy. ... : IntelMole (#7) «

#3, Mmm, Women in uniform. : BobbinThreadbare (#8) «

#8, No. Women UNDRESSING out of that uniform ;) : PLASTIC SURGEON (#9) «

#1. Posted at 04:03 PM on Apr 20th 2006

Edit Reply

Proesterchen

The only thing clear to me about this case it that the timeframe calling for trial no earlier than 2 years from today is going to bore whichever audience this thing had to death. Such delays seem very anachronistic in a time where lots of people don't have the attention span to watch a 120-minute movie.

#1, 2 years is actually pretty quick for a civil trial case. : Captain Ned (#6) «

#5. Posted at 05:51 PM on Apr 20th 2006

Edit Reply

DrDillyBar

By raising prices eh...

#2. Posted at 04:25 PM on Apr 20th 2006

Edit Reply

jehurey

Time for John Grisham to start writing his next best-seller.