33 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #33. Posted at 04:25 PM on May 5th 2006 Edit   Reply

bloody truth indeed.

After I told my dad about sony's rootkit, and told him NOT to buy the HD tv he was looking at because it wasn't going to support the hdcp flag and he wont see what he wants would be in hdcp anyway, he's boycotting sony. Granted other companies also released tv's that dont support hdcp and this will screw over people with hd disc players that require it and the broadcast flag, but combined with the insult that people shouldn't bother with the rootkit because they don't know what it is, the ability to disable a hd-disc player remotely if it's found playing illegitimate material or "anything it's not suppossed to do", being one the the big driving forces behind DRM, Infecting people with rootkits in the first place, setting higher prices on their blu-ray movie discs than they should be and continuing to sell TV's that arn't supporting hdcp - the very DRM they're pushing,

- my family is boycotting sony.

Sony did a backflip into the lava
collapse

   #32. Posted at 09:13 AM on May 5th 2006, Edited at 09:15 AM on May 5th 2006 Edit   Reply

"Unlike DVI, DisplayPort also supports content protection via 128-bit ASE encryption"

note to self: do not be stupid and fund this crap; if i've paid for a monitor i'll watch whatever i damnwell please on it.
collapse

   #31. Posted at 08:48 AM on May 5th 2006 Edit   Reply

Connectors.

Are the connectors going to work any better than HDMI connectors, and (GASP!) SATA (I know, not display) connectors?

Composite connectors are solid. S-video connectors are less solid.

DVI connectors are solid. HDMI connectors are not so solid.

IDE connectors are solid. SATA connectors plain SUCK!

Why the nasty trend of making less solid and reliable connectors when ne w technological signaling and cables are introduced? Is there a poll or petition somewhere we can use to complain to the standards creators?
collapse

   #11. Posted at 06:18 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

So is there any way for us to realistically fight DRM or are they just going to shove it up our ass with zero resistance?
collapse

   #29. Posted at 06:26 AM on May 5th 2006 Edit   Reply

DRM?

kthxbye. I just want to plug end A of cable into PC and end B of cable into screen. Why does DRM have to poke its head where it has no right to be?
collapse

   #4. Posted at 04:51 PM on May 4th 2006, Edited at 08:02 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

Wheres the real advancement?

Dual Link DVI according to those specs is 9.9 Gbps and has no sound. Another 0.9 Gbps, woo wee woopity do!
BTW how much of that bandwidth is extra gravy DRM appeasement? HDCP retardation isn't enough? (attn internet: cracknowplzthx)

I personally hate HDMI but its important to note that it does have 2 channel sound and 10bit (12? whatever, its more than 8) color when used, and soon will have a 'dual link' equivalent actually supported in hardware.

I though maybe they would actually be looking towards the future with bigger resolutions and/or more bits per color. And if they have sound, at the very least a full 5.1 bitstream or more.

Otherwise, why should anyone give up dual link DVI, now that you can finally buy non-overpriced cables and its nearly universal on gfx cards.
collapse

   #27. Posted at 03:26 AM on May 5th 2006 Edit   Reply

Higher resolution???? colour depth??? 32bit now 64 bit???? can some one explain me WTF is this ????
collapse

   #17. Posted at 07:37 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

Great, so now I need a videocard that supports:

DirectX 10
DisplayPort 1.0
HDMI

For Vista and HD content to work.

Right? Or am I missing something here?
collapse

   #13. Posted at 06:35 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

ROFL, Dislayport 1.0 = computer verison of HDMI.
collapse

   #8. Posted at 05:46 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

to accomdate vista? WTF!!! wut if i dont wanna use vista? there are other os's out there. osx x86 anyone?
collapse

   #9. Posted at 06:04 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

Umm, did i just see a double post ?? what's going on ?

Adi
collapse

   #5. Posted at 05:14 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

Lets hope they implement it sans DRM protection. It's nice to finally have a combined computer, TV, and general A/V standard, but DRMing it down will lead to more incompatibilities, privacy and legal concerns from both companies and consumers, higher costs, workarounds, and more things just plain not working.

And honestly, people expected all the tech bells and whistles: 10.8 giga-bit bandwidth, more color-depth, and highly scalable to large resolutions and screen sizes. Whadda you think they'd make - a new standard only for 15" CRTs (maybe it'd support color, like TV's in the 1950's ;-)? Backwards compatibility will initially be important, but just like current vga-dvi converters did for CRTs -> LCDs, it won't practically matter once products really start rolling out.

~David~

BTW - did they mean 128-bit AES encryption? What is ASE?
collapse

   #3. Posted at 04:33 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

Windows Vista, which will allegedly support higher resolutions and color depths than Windows XP.

Are there actually displays that support higher resolutions than XP can handle? And would anyone actually attach one to a computer that runs Windows?
collapse

   #2. Posted at 04:18 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

Bah, content protection. They can protect deez...
collapse

   #1. Posted at 04:11 PM on May 4th 2006, Edited at 04:11 PM on May 4th 2006 Edit   Reply

DisplayPort or Unified Display Interface (UDI) ?

Go Vote now!
http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=37907&highlight=
collapse
33 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q