Today's forum tidings topic comes courtesy of gerbil nstuff, who asked in our AMD Asylum forum whether other gerbils think history is likely to repeat itself in the processor world. In his thread, nstuff points to TR's review archive and our early encounters with AMD's very first Athlon 64 processors. Indeed, there are similarities between AMD's position in mid-2003 and its position now. Back then, AMD was stuck with a processor architecture that was growing increasingly inadequate, and it was losing ground to Intel at the high end.
However, things changed rather dramatically after the September Athlon 64 launch, and AMD largely regained its edge while its competitor stumbled with power consumption and clock scaling problems. Do you think history might repeat itself this year—or the next—or do you think Phenom won't be enough to give AMD its groove back? Feel free to hit nstuff's thread to share your opinions.
|Aerocool starts Project 7 with a flurry of case and cooling gear||3|
|NTFS filesystem bug could crash Windows 7, 8, and 8.1||7|
|Enermax NeoChanger is both a pump and a reservoir||3|
|Acer sprinkles the Iconia Tab 10 with quantum dots||6|
|Deals of the week: lots of motherboards and a cheap GTX 1080||18|
|MSI Vortex G25VR, Infinite-A, and Pro 20EX PCs fill all niches||1|
|Nvidia unveils the GeForce GTX Battlebox certification program||25|
|Acer Spin 1 and Nitro 5 laptops are ready for school season||13|
|Ryzen AGESA 22.214.171.124 exposes more memory overclocking options||55|