We've already seen plenty of evidence that shows Intel's Core i7 processors will have a clock-for-clock performance edge over today's Core 2 chips. Benchmarks that popped up in early June had a 2.66GHz Bloomfield outdo a 2.66GHz Core 2 Quad Q9450 by 33.5%, even though the former had only one memory channel operating.
What can we expect from a healthy Core i7 on the high-end front? Expreview claims to have caught a peek at benchmarks Intel sent to its partners. Those benchmarks supposedly pit a 3.2GHz Core 2 Extreme QX9770 against a Core i7 965 (also clocked at 3.2GHz, if past reports are accurate), and they give the Core i7 a 52% advantage in 3D games, a 38% edge in rendering tasks, and a 41% lead in video editing and conversion.
We'd take these numbers with a grain of salt even if they did come from Intel. Still, that kind of performance delta sounds plausible in light of earlier benchmarks, and it means Intel's top-of-the-line Core i7 could be a screamer when it arrives later this year. Going by information the rumor mill spit out this summer, the "Core i7 965" should cost $999, while its 2.93GHz derivative will cost $562, and the cheapest Core i7 variant will couple a 2.66GHz clock speed with a $284 price tag.
|1. Ryszard - $603||2. Hdfisise - $600||3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502|
|4. Redocbew - $350||5. the - $306||6. SomeOtherGeek - $300|
|7. chasp_0 - $251||8. Ryu Connor - $250||9. mbutrovich - $250|
|10. YetAnotherGeek2 - $200|
|AMD's Radeon Software Crimson Edition: an overview||91|
|Phanteks' Power Splitter lets two systems run on one PSU||2|
|Just Cause 3 system requirements won't blow up your wallet||6|
|Biostar's GeForce Gaming GTX 950 glows a fiery red||5|
|Asus updates Zenbook UX305 with a Skylake Core M CPU||34|
|Shuttle XPC Nano's svelte body is clad in black and gold||17|
|AMD ends driver support for non-GCN Radeon cards||75|
|Dell owns up to eDellRoot hole and provides removal instructions||17|
|MIT researchers say many popular Android apps call out covertly||13|