Ok, so here's something a little off topic that might make for an interesting evening's worth of activity as the Friday Night Topic returns to action. I just noticed the other day that we have a Wikipedia page and that it's, uh, not that great.
I mean, somebody went to the trouble of creating a page for us and getting it approved by the powers that be, and for that, I am grateful. But, well, it's one of those backwaters of Wikipedia that's not really up to the best of standards. Reading it, you'd think we were a big forum with little emphasis on news, reviews, or podcasts. And that I had some long-standing rivaly with THG, which is silly, since they're 54.375 times our size and owned by a French mega-conglomerate. Also, I know some guys over there and like them fine.
Surely we can do better.
Any of you find examples of more complete pages there we can emulate? Ideas for edits? What works and doesn't when making these sorts of contributions? Hmm.
|In the lab: FLIR's One thermal camera||37|
|Black Friday deals: Dell's U3415 curved monitor for $650 and more||25|
|Abu Dhabi government fund may be shopping GlobalFoundries||62|
|Asus goes for the gold with its 20th Anniversary GTX 980 Ti||7|
|MSI's Eco motherboards let owners fine-tune power consumption||9|
|Gigabyte's Z170X-Gaming G1 motherboard reviewed||15|
|Star Wars Battlefront video review||40|
|Club 3D active adapters convert DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0||23|
|Phanteks' Power Splitter lets two systems run on one PSU||45|
|This is the answer to SSK's question on the Firefox news post.||+33|