Doing the research and building the facilities needed to churn out impossibly small transistors doesn't come cheap. As EE Times reports, GlobalFoundries CEO Doug Grose recently spoke at the GSA Expo in Santa Clara, and he quoted some figures that really put the whole foundry business in perspective.
The research-and-development costs alone are exorbitant, and they only keep rising as technology gets more advanced. Developing 90- to 65-nm process technology will set you back $310-400 million, said Grose, but you'd better be prepared to plunk down $600-900 million for 45- to 32-nm nodes and a whopping $1.3 billion to go down to 22 and 12 nm.
How about facilities? That'll cost you $2.5-3.5 billion if you want a fab sophisticated enough to produce 90- or 65-nm wafers. Here, too, costs go up dramatically with finer processes: $3.5-4 billion at the 45- and 32-nm nodes, then $4.5-6 billion at 22 and 12 nm.
EE Times says Grose commented, ''Despite the technical challenges, the biggest hurdle to continued innovation (in the semiconductor industry) is economics." No wonder AMD spun off its manufacturing business, and ATIC, GlobalFoundries' co-owner, sought consolidation by moving to acquire Chartered Semiconductor last month.
|1. Ryszard - $603||2. Hdfisise - $600||3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502|
|4. the - $306||5. SomeOtherGeek - $300||6. Ryu Connor - $250|
|7. chasp_0 - $151||8. Anonymous Gerbil - $150||9. dashbarron - $150|
|10. webkido13 - $135|
|Run with PowerColor's Devil 13 Dual Core R9 390 graphics card||60|
|We are live on Twitch talking Skylake with David Kanter||1|
|The gaping maw of Lian Li's PC-V33 is ready to swallow ATX mobos||10|
|Huawei leapfrogs Apple with pressure-sensitive Mate S phone||29|
|Tune in for our Skylake live stream tonight with David Kanter||21|
|Get the speed you need with Toshiba Q300 SSDs||10|
|ZenWatch 2 runs Android Wear Asus-style||16|
|Asus previews ROG Swift PG348Q and PG279Q G-Sync monitors||28|
|Wanted for review: AMD's Radeon R9 Nano||173|