Remember those low-end 40-nm GeForces we wrote about in July? Nvidia's website still classifies those graphics cards as "OEM products," but you can expect them to start popping up at retailers and e-tailers before too long. Gigabyte, for one, has announced retail-boxed versions of the GeForce GT 220 and GeForce G210, which both support DirectX 10.1 and have sub-$100 suggested retail prices.
Here's a full rundown of the specifications:
|Model||SPs||Core clock||Shader clock||Mem. clock||Memory||Mem. bus|
|Gigabyte GeForce GT 220
|Gigabyte GeForce G210
Compared to the OEM cards, Gigabyte has bumped up core clocks but dropped memory speeds (albeit only slightly in the case of the GT 220). Also, Gigabyte's GT 220 has a full-height circuit board with a much meatier cooler that includes an 80-mm fan.
Gigabyte tells us its GeForce GT 220 will set you back $79.99, while you can expect to nab the G210 for $44.99. If the specifications above weren't a strong enough hint, the prices are: these are low-end cards that definitely won't dazzle you with silky smooth frame rates at high resolutions. Still, the HDMI outputs and low power consumption (Nvidia rates the OEM-only GeForce G210 for just 30.5W) could make these new offerings good candidates for media-center PCs.
Knowing how retail GPU launches usually occur, other Nvidia partners likely have GeForce GT 220 and G210 cards heading to stores, as well.
|1. Ryszard - $503||2. punkUser - $502||3. the - $306|
|4. SomeOtherGeek - $300||5. Ryu Connor - $250||6. doubtful500 - $200|
|7. Anonymous Gerbil - $150||8. danny e. - $125||9. SecretSquirrel - $125|
|10. Techonomics - $100|
|Friday night topic: quadcopters!||18|
|The TR Podcast video 173: Torquing the Titan||1|
|Report: AMD R&D spending falls to near-10-year low||68|
|Deal of the week: Ultra-wide IPS for $750, 16GB DDR4-2666 for $190, plus more||42|
|Broadwell Xeon D lands on Mini-ITX boards||33|
|Half-Life 2: Update mod adds modern polish to old classic||57|
|The TR Podcast is live, so come ask us stuff!||1|
|AMD shows off DirectX 12 performance with new 3DMark benchmark||80|