For folks who love reading about the intricate details of CPU microarchitectures, David Kanter of Real World Technologies probably needs no introduction. In his latest treatise, Kanter tackles Intel's Sandy Bridge, systematically comparing and contrasting Intel's new baby to both Nehalem, which it will supplant, and AMD's Bulldozer, with which it will compete.
If the charts and in-depth architectural commentary fly too high over your head, the last page of the article has something everyone should enjoy: performance predictions. Kanter admits these are merely educated estimates, but hey, those are always fun.
In Kanter's view, Sandy Bridge is "first and foremost a client microprocessor," while AMD's Bulldozer is "firmly aimed at the server market," and thus will prioritize multi-threaded performance above all. Kanter expects Intel to get the upper hand on the desktop thanks to AVX, which he says developers will use considerably more than AMD's FMA4 instruction set. The performance delta between the two designs should be "minimal" in today's SSE apps, though.
|A technology overview of the Aimpad R5 analog keyboard||1|
|Microsoft helps hardware companies make VR more affordable||3|
|Intel P3100 M.2 SSD has datacenters in mind||7|
|Microsoft Surface Ergonomic Keyboard merges comfort and style||20|
|Surface Studio puts the iMac on notice||56|
|Microsoft Surface Book i7 packs a bigger punch and more batteries||37|
|G.Skill KM570 MX keyboard goes back to the basics||4|
|Intel's Purley server platform won't use 3D XPoint memory||4|
|In the lab: EVGA's GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Superclocked graphics card||40|
|Signing your posts is daftly redundant. Meadows||+29|