Although OLED displays can now be found in smartphones and extremely expensive televisions, the technology has struggled to ramp up to larger panel sizes. The problem, it seems, is that OLEDs must be patterned as they're laid out on a display. Patterning is currently being done with a shadow mask technique that can't maintain its accuracy as things scale up. No wonder those ultra-thin OLED TVs are so expensive.
According to this article published by MIT's Technology Review, a better alternative could exist in the form of a new display type dubbed QLED. MIT spin-off QD Vision developed the display technology, whose pixels are made up of quantum-dot LEDs. When exposed to light or an electrical current, these nanometer-scale semiconductors emit bright, pure colors that don't need to be filtered. And they reportedly do so more efficiently than OLEDs, allowing QLEDs to get by with lower operating voltages.
At the moment, longevity seems to be the biggest problem facing QLEDs; the current generation has a lifespan of only 10,000 hours. Ensuring color uniformity also presents a challenge, but QD Vision CTO Seth Coe-Sullivan thinks we're "just getting to that point where you can see commercialization on the horizon." Let's hope that horizon comes quicker than it has for affordable large-scale OLED displays.
|Silverstone's Strider Titanium PSUs are ready for a high-power future||11|
|VR180 video bridges the gap between YouTube and VR||0|
|Steam 2017 Summer Sale, part deux||15|
|Deals of the week: Z270 mobos, spinning storage, and more||4|
|G.Skill readies up for X299 with quad-channel DDR4 at 4200 MT/s||16|
|Asus' VivoBook S510 is an ultrabook for the budget crowd||16|
|Windows Insider Build 16226 gives users a look at GPU utilization||24|
|Steam's 2017 Summer Sale is downright hot||49|
|Asus XG-C100C NIC breaks the gigabit barrier||34|
|Put yourself on the fast ring if you dare. I find it amazing that they will let major deal breaker bugs get released on that ring (i.e. microsoft's ow...||+5|