IHS iSuppli says AMD commanded 11.8% of revenue for all microprocessor sales (x86 and non-x86) in the first quarter of last year, but that share shrank to 10.9% by the fourth quarter and further decreased to 10.1% in the first quarter of this year. Over the same time period, Intel's share of overall microprocessor revenue purportedly climbed from 80.6% to 82.6%.
Now, IHS iSuppli goes on to point out that Intel and AMD's combined share of overall CPU revenue has grown by 0.2 points since last year, which means the x86 market likely grew, as well. So, the fact that AMD lost revenue share in the overall CPU market implies that the underdog suffered revenue share losses in the x86 processor market, as well, despite largely flat shipment growth (by IDC's count).
Translation: AMD seems to be selling roughly the same number of processors but making less and less money per CPU. I'm guessing the Phenom II price cuts enacted in response to the arrival of Sandy Bridge haven't helped—and neither has the fact that AMD has no desktop chips priced north of $200 right now. The tables may turn by the time Bulldozer processors show up, but that won't be for another couple of months or so.
|Canon EOS 5D Mark IV offers more pixels and better autofocus||17|
|Adata Ultimate SU800 SSDs use floating-gate 3D NAND||3|
|Thermaltake's Core G3 ATX chassis is slim and trim||9|
|Alienware desktops with Polaris cards get caught on camera||15|
|AMD and Nvidia court gamers with new pack-in bundles||34|
|First Deus Ex: Mankind Divided patch focuses on crash fixes||33|
|Trendnet TEW-809UB makes 802.11ac connectivity portable||6|
|MasterPulse Over-ear headset can be both open and closed||13|
|Nvidia improves virtual graphics monitoring in its latest Grid update||1|
|Seconded. We need a paradigm shift in how these buzzwords are used!||+32|