AMD's latest ballpark estimates peg the launch of Zambezi processors in September at the latest. That said, the initial batch of chips might be outpaced by faster successors not long thereafter. X-bit labs reports that AMD is cooking up a four-CPU Zambezi refresh for the first quarter of 2012.
That refresh will reportedly include FX-8170, FX-8120, FX-6120, and FX-4120 processors. Looking at the model numbers alone, it's easy to figure out that these chips will likely be quicker than those in the launch lineup. X-bit labs says the first four Zambezi processors will be branded FX-8150, FX-8100, FX-6100, and FX-4100.
Specifications for some of the CPUs leaked out earlier this month. Word is that the FX-8150 wil have eight cores, a 3.6GHz base clock speed, a 4.2GHz turbo speed, and a 125W thermal envelope. The leading digit in FX-series model numbers apparently stands for the core count, while the last two digits represent performance. For example, the FX-4100 is said to have four cores, a 3.6GHz base speed, and a 3.8GHz peak turbo speed.
In any case, assuming X-bit labs' information is correct, AMD should have some new blood to ready to face Intel's 22-nm Ivy Bridge processors in early 2012. Whether we'll see a competitive fight is another story, though.
|1. Ryszard - $603||2. Hdfisise - $600||3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502|
|4. Redocbew - $350||5. the - $306||6. SomeOtherGeek - $300|
|7. chasp_0 - $251||8. Ryu Connor - $250||9. mbutrovich - $250|
|10. YetAnotherGeek2 - $200|
|In the lab: FLIR's One thermal camera||37|
|Black Friday deals: Dell's U3415 curved monitor for $650 and more||24|
|Abu Dhabi government fund may be shopping GlobalFoundries||62|
|Asus goes for the gold with its 20th Anniversary GTX 980 Ti||7|
|MSI's Eco motherboards let owners fine-tune power consumption||9|
|Gigabyte's Z170X-Gaming G1 motherboard reviewed||15|
|Star Wars Battlefront video review||40|
|Club 3D active adapters convert DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0||23|
|Phanteks' Power Splitter lets two systems run on one PSU||45|
|This is the answer to SSK's question on the Firefox news post.||+33|