In the wake of IDF, it sounds like PC vendors and manufacturers are still voicing concerns about the whole ultrabook concept. Some are doing so overtly, while others are choosing to stay anonymous.
DigiTimes reports that Acer President Scott Lin and Compal President Ray Chen have both urged Intel to lower processor prices. Lin claimed that, without a price cut, PC vendors might outfit their ultrabooks with underpowered chips and fail to push the systems as aggressively. Chen, meanwhile, suggested that Intel might have trouble hitting its ultrabook targets if it doesn't slash prices.
A separate story, also posted by DigiTimes, quotes nameless "sources from PC players" who reckon that consumers might poo-poo ultrabooks, "because average prices are still about 30% higher than those of mainstream notebooks." The sources believe that ultrabooks may be successful, but only if they offer good performance per dollar and are actively promoted by both "channel retailers and notebook brand vendors."
I have to say I'm split. On the one hand, those could be very legitimate complaints about a category of PCs Intel has promoted heavily in recent months. On the other hand, PC makers could simply be trying to exert pressure in order to secure higher margins ahead of the first ultrabook sales. Time will tell, I suppose.
|AMD drops prices on the Radeon RX 460 and RX 470||44|
|HyperX Alloy keyboard gets lean and mean for FPS gaming||1|
|Reports: Radeon RX 470D is a budget Polaris card for China||9|
|Examining reports of slow write speeds on the 32GB iPhone 7||31|
|Cellular Insights dissects iPhone 7 Plus modem performance||11|
|Deals of the week: scads of high-performance storage and more||9|
|Tobii's Eye Tracker 4C knows where your head is||5|
|GeForce driver 375.57 is prepared for Titanfall 2||8|
|Phanteks Eclipse P400 gets a tempered glass option||0|
|A real "console monitor" would be 720p @ 30 Hz ;P||+63|