Ronald already caught this in the 'bread yesterday, but it bears repeating: the rumored Ivy Bridge delay might only affect dual-core, mobile offerings, not the quad-core desktop variants we're all looking forward to.
Last week, DigiTimes said Intel was planning to postpone mass shipments of Ivy Bridge chips until June. Now, VR-Zone says that report wasn't entirely accurate. Only mobile, dual-core Ivy CPUs have been pushed back, the site says. Socketed desktop processors are still on track for an April debut.
VR-Zone adds that the delay will affect both standard and ultra-low-voltage offerings—and yes, that will apparently include chips intended for ultrabooks. "We won't see any updated Ultrabooks until May or June," the site says. As for Intel's motive, VR-Zone echoes DigiTimes. Word is that there are simply too many Sandy Bridge processors in the channel, and stocks need to dry up before next-gen products can make an appearance.
In the end, Ivy Bridge ultrabooks could launch side by side with competing laptops with AMD silicon inside. At CES last month, AMD gave us a "mid-year" schedule for 17W Trinity APUs aimed at ulta-thin notebooks (which would be called ultrabooks if Intel hadn't trademark the term). In its 17W incarnation, Trinity is supposed to offer the same level of performance as today's 35W, quad-core Llano designs—more than enough brawn for a slim laptop, in other words, although perhaps not quite as much muscle as Ivy Bridge.
|Gigabyte SA-SBCAP3350 puts formidable power on a single board||5|
|Alphacool Eisblock HDX-2 and HDX-3 help M.2 SSDs beat the heat||1|
|Corsair Lighting Pro Expansion Kit lets builders turn up the lights||3|
|Adata D16750 power bank is tougher than the average juice pack||6|
|Deals of the week: fast memory, an AM4 motherboard, and more||9|
|Corsair RMx White Series PSUs take a walk on the snowy side||20|
|Intel crams 100 GFLOPS of neural-net inferencing onto a USB stick||34|
|Toshiba's XG5 1TB NVMe SSD reviewed||8|
|Microsoft and Johnson Controls put Cortana in a thermostat||22|
|Ah crap, if EUV stops being the technology that's always 5 years away from being real then I'll have to go back to Fusion.||+26|