Google loves to brag about how secure its Chrome browser is, and the results of last year's Pwn2Own hacking competition only gave the company more ammo. Well, at this year's event, some hackers wanted to feed Google humble pie—and they did.
As ZDNet reports, security researcher Chaouki Bekrar and his team managed to take "complete control of a fully patched 64-bit Windows 7 (SP1) machine" using two zero-day vulnerabilities in Google's browser. Chaouki said the feat took six weeks of preparatory work that involved locating the vulnerabilities and writing code to exploit them.
Chrome ended up being the first browser to fall at the competition yesterday. "We wanted to show that Chrome was not unbreakable. Last year, we saw a lot of headlines that no one could hack Chrome. We wanted to make sure it was the first to fall this year," said Bekrar. The hacking competition was part of this year's CanSecWest conference, which is still going on today and tomorrow in Vancouver, Canada.
There was more on the line than hacker cred and some free PR for Bekrar, of course. Google is actively encouraging hackers to find holes in Chrome. Last month, the company said it would be offering $1 million in prizes for hackers who find holes in the browser. Finding a "full Chrome exploit" entails a $60,000 prize, and Google throws in a free Chromebook. Cash prizes are also awarded for the discovery of security holes involving other software but liable to affect Chrome users. (Thanks to TR reader SH SOTN for the link.)
|The TR Podcast 166 is now available on YouTube||20|
|Chromebooks now come with 1TB of cloud storage for two years||22|
|Deal of the week: Devil's Canyon starting at $179.99, Intel 730 Series for $0.42/GB, and more||32|
|AMD prolongs A-series software deal; price cuts still a work in progress||22|
|Report: Valve lays out new rules for Early Access games||55|
|Intel's 2015 revenue outlook beats Street expectations||53|
|Intel's 3D NAND has 32 layers and 256Gb per die||60|
|Telltale's Game of Thrones game looks pretty good||12|
|Sounds like a good way to conceal the terrible financial performance of the mobile business unit.||+36|