It's doubtful Microsoft's Surface for Windows RT tablet will launch at $199, as the rumor mill has suggested. However, Lenovo now suggests Windows RT tablets may not cost a whole lot more when they launch later this year.
Lenovo's David Schmoock, who spoke to Bloomberg recently, says he expects Windows RT tablets to cost $200-300 less than their Intel-powered Windows 8 counterparts. (Windows RT, of course, will run only on ARM hardware.) Schmoock also expects Intel-based tablets running Windows 8 to be priced at $600-700.
Based on those figures, we can also extrapolate that the WinRT offerings will start at $300-400. It's not clear what size devices Schmoock was referring to, though. $300 would be tantalizingly affordable for a 10" tablet, but it would be a little pricey for a 7" device. Google's Nexus 7 and Amazon's Kindle Fire both cost $199.
In any case, it seems like there's going to be a substantial price disparity between x86 and ARM devices. That's not entirely unexpected, though. When it announced its Surface tablets back in June, Microsoft clearly stated that the Windows 8 model would be priced in the same league as ultrabooks, while the WinRT offering would be competitive with other ARM tablets.
Windows RT and Windows 8 devices are both due out on October 26.
|1. Ryszard - $603||2. Hdfisise - $600||3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502|
|4. Redocbew - $350||5. the - $306||6. SomeOtherGeek - $300|
|7. chasp_0 - $251||8. Ryu Connor - $250||9. mbutrovich - $250|
|10. YetAnotherGeek2 - $200|
|In the lab: FLIR's One thermal camera||37|
|Black Friday deals: Dell's U3415 curved monitor for $650 and more||24|
|Abu Dhabi government fund may be shopping GlobalFoundries||62|
|Asus goes for the gold with its 20th Anniversary GTX 980 Ti||7|
|MSI's Eco motherboards let owners fine-tune power consumption||9|
|Gigabyte's Z170X-Gaming G1 motherboard reviewed||15|
|Star Wars Battlefront video review||40|
|Club 3D active adapters convert DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0||23|
|Phanteks' Power Splitter lets two systems run on one PSU||45|
|This is the answer to SSK's question on the Firefox news post.||+33|