This rumor came totally out of left field yesterday—really, an iWatch? But now that it's been echoed by both the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, I think all this talk of a wearable "watch-like device" from Apple probably holds water.
Let's see... the Journal quotes "people briefed on the effort" who say Apple is "experimenting with designs for a watch-like device that would perform some functions of a smartphone." Word is that the Mac maker has already approached Foxconn, its largest manufacturing partner, about the device.
The Times has a few more specifics. Quoting "people familiar with the company’s explorations," it says Apple is working on a device that's "made of curved glass" and "would operate on Apple's iOS platform." The Times adds that investors already expect the Apple watch to replace smartphones in the future. Oh, those crazy investors.
You know, I haven't worn a watch since I got a smartphone a few years ago, and I'd like things to say that way. I like not having something heavy grinding around my wrist all day, soaking up sweat and tugging at the hairs on my arm. I like having a device with a big-enough screen on which I can browse the web comfortably. Also, I like not having to contort myself to show vacation photos or funny Internet pictures. The iWatch might be real, and Apple might market it successfully, but I'm not sure I quite see the point.
|Here's the not-so-live video version of The TR Podcast 164||10|
|Here's what's cooking in Damage Labs||13|
|Deal of the week: An IPS ultra-wide for $420, plus cheap SSDs and more||14|
|Microsoft's quarterly revenue up 25% on strong Surface, Xbox sales||18|
|Assassin's Creed Unity PC requires 6GB of RAM, GTX 680||204|
|Join us as we attempt to live stream The TR Podcast tonight||13|
|Civ: Beyond Earth with Mantle aims to end multi-GPU microstuttering||65|
|CPU startup claims to achieve 3x IPC gains with VISC architecture||59|
|I just found this AMAZING trick! Call of Duty takes up 0GB if you just don't buy it!||+114|