Crucial M500 SSD now selling for 59 cents per gig


— 12:19 PM on April 9, 2013

Remember Crucial's M500 SSD? The successor to the two-year-old m4 was announced in January at the Consumer Electronics Show, and now, the drive has finally made its way online. True to Crucial's promise, you can get a 960GB version for under $600.

Amazon seems to have the lowest prices right now, with the 960GB model selling for $570. That works out to 59 cents per gig, which is unheard of for an SSD boasting almost a terabyte of storage. 960GB SSDs typically cost a grand and up.

Expect to pay more per gigabyte for the lower-capacity M500 variants, though. The 480, 240, and 120GB models are selling for $363, $202, and $129, respectively—$0.76, $0.84, and $1.08 per gig.

Like its m4 predecessor, the M500 uses Marvell controller silicon. This time, it's the Marvell 88SS9177, which is paired with custom firmware and Micron's own 20-nm MLC NAND. The M500 also sports hardware-based encryption, improved thermal management, and power-loss protection. It has a more efficient sleep mode, as well; Crucial claims the M500's slumber state consumes 93% less power than that of the old m4.

The Crucial M500 is purportedly capable of hitting 500MB/s with sequential reads and 400MB/s with writes, although those figures apply only to the 480 and 960GB models. The 240 and 120GB versions have sequential write rates of 250 and 130MB/s, respectively, putting them in the same league as Samsung's budget 840 Series drive. We're working on putting together a Crucial M500 review and hope to have some numbers comparing the SSD to the 840 Series and its other rivals soon. Stay tuned.

Like what we're doing? Pay what you want to support TR and get nifty extra features.
Top contributors
1. Hdfisise - $600 2. Ryszard - $503 3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502
4. the - $306 5. SomeOtherGeek - $300 6. Ryu Connor - $250
7. doubtful500 - $200 8. Anonymous Gerbil - $150 9. webkido13 - $135
10. cygnus1 - $126
   
Register
Tip: You can use the A/Z keys to walk threads.
View options

This discussion is now closed.