I've gotta admit, I'm much less engaged with world news and politics than I used to be, in large part because I have struggled to find news sources that 1) I can trust and 2) have a broad enough focus to keep me well-informed. There's more to it, but I do have the sense that the major media organizations have declined in overall quality and have become fascinated with chasing readership or viewership at the expense of everything else. This episode on MSNBC this past week is a great (and terrible) example:
Yes, they cut off the congresswoman talking NSA overreach in order to bring us a breaking story on Justin Bieber's booze and strippers.
I know there's no perfect news source, but I'm curious: where do you get your news? How many different outlets do you frequent? And how much do you trust what you're reading or hearing? Is there a chance that the news outlets you "like" aren't necessarily all that objective, but instead just feed your pre-conceived ways of interpreting the world? If so, how have you addressed this problem?
|Intel kicks off eighth-gen Core with four cores and eight threads in 15W||32|
|Asus Vivobook Pro N580VD-DB74T can do offices and kids' parties||13|
|AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X CPUs reviewed||111|
|Thermaltake View 71 flaunts its glass on all angles||8|
|Deals of the week: mobos, CPUs, displays, and more||7|
|Alphacool HDX5 keeps a pair of M.2 SSDs cool||0|
|AMD weighs in on Radeon RX Vega pricing controversy||84|
|Intel expands its Atoms' radius with C3000 SoCs||51|
|Shuttle XH110G packs a PCIe x16 slot into a three-liter package||22|
|Okay, fine. We'll drop it until the next time it happens.||+14|