I've gotta admit, I'm much less engaged with world news and politics than I used to be, in large part because I have struggled to find news sources that 1) I can trust and 2) have a broad enough focus to keep me well-informed. There's more to it, but I do have the sense that the major media organizations have declined in overall quality and have become fascinated with chasing readership or viewership at the expense of everything else. This episode on MSNBC this past week is a great (and terrible) example:
Yes, they cut off the congresswoman talking NSA overreach in order to bring us a breaking story on Justin Bieber's booze and strippers.
I know there's no perfect news source, but I'm curious: where do you get your news? How many different outlets do you frequent? And how much do you trust what you're reading or hearing? Is there a chance that the news outlets you "like" aren't necessarily all that objective, but instead just feed your pre-conceived ways of interpreting the world? If so, how have you addressed this problem?
|1. GKey13 - $650||2. JohnC - $600||3. davidbowser - $501|
|4. cmpxchg - $500||5. DeadOfKnight - $400||6. danny e. - $375|
|7. the - $360||8. Ryszard - $351||9. rbattle - $350|
|10. Ryu Connor - $350|
|''Biggest ever'' iPhone launch drives strong Q4 Apple financials||28|
|IBM-GlobalFoundries deal faces regulatory hurdles||31|
|You can now pre-order Asus' $199 Win8.1 netbook||27|
|Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare needs 6GB of RAM and 55GB of storage||81|
|Gmail for Android 5.0 Lollipop to support non-Gmail accounts||17|
|GeForce GTX 970 cards from MSI and Asus reviewed||33|
|Biostar mini PC combines Bay Trail quad with USB audio||15|
|GlobalFoundries to acquire IBM's microelectronics business||50|
|Forbes: Microsoft smartwatch to launch within 'next few weeks'||22|