At CES, Scott got up close to an MSI Mini-ITX motherboard powered by a desktop version of Intel's Bay Trail processor. Now, as Liliputing reports, Gigabyte and Biostar have introduced a couple of similar boards featuring the same chip.
The Gigabyte J1800N-D2H and Biostar J1800NH both feature the Celeron J1800, a dual-core Bay Trail model with a 10W TDP and a top Turbo speed of 2.58GHz. In both boards, the chip is tucked under a passive heatsink, and it's surrounded by the following: two DDR3 SO-DIMM slots, one PCIe x1 slot, one Mini PCIe x1 slot, two Serial ATA 3Gbps ports, a single USB 3.0 port, four USB 2.0 ports, Gigabit Ethernet, and a choice of HDMI and VGA outputs.
Here's the Gigabyte J1800N-D2H:
And here's the Biostar J1800NH:
Aside from the coloring of the circuit board, heatsink, and slots, these two boards are pretty similar. The only noteworthy differences I can see are that Biostar positions its SO-DIMM slots differently and puts a smaller heatsink on the CPU. I guess that Celeron J1800 doesn't need much cooling.
According to Liliputing, the Gigabyte J1800N-D2H and Biostar J1800NH are both supposed to be priced around the $60 mark, much like the MSI offering Scott spotted at CES. The Biostar model is already listed at Directron for $55.99.
|1. Ryszard - $603||2. Hdfisise - $600||3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502|
|4. Redocbew - $350||5. the - $306||6. SomeOtherGeek - $300|
|7. chasp_0 - $251||8. Ryu Connor - $250||9. mbutrovich - $250|
|10. YetAnotherGeek2 - $200|
|In the lab: FLIR's One thermal camera||13|
|Black Friday deals: Dell's U3415 curved monitor for $650 and more||17|
|Abu Dhabi government fund may be shopping GlobalFoundries||25|
|Asus goes for the gold with its 20th Anniversary GTX 980 Ti||6|
|MSI's Eco motherboards let owners fine-tune power consumption||6|
|Gigabyte's Z170X-Gaming G1 motherboard reviewed||12|
|Star Wars Battlefront video review||38|
|Club 3D active adapters convert DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0||22|
|Phanteks' Power Splitter lets two systems run on one PSU||45|
|This is the answer to SSK's question on the Firefox news post.||+33|