One of the hottest topics in the wake of AMD's Ryzen CPU launch has been the appropriate monitor resolution at which to test CPU performance. AMD claims that the trend among high-end systems is toward higher-resolution displays like 2560x1440 and 4K, making CPU performance less relevant for gaming. The Steam hardware survey says otherwise: that more people play on 1920x1080 displays than all higher-resolution gamers combined. That's before we get into the plethora of refresh rates that are available on high-end gaming monitors today.
With all that in mind, we figure the best course of action is to ask the TR audience. What's the resolution and refresh rate of your primary gaming display?
|Adata D16750 power bank is tougher than the average juice pack||0|
|Deals of the week: fast memory, an AM4 motherboard, and more||0|
|Corsair RMx White Series PSUs take a walk on the snowy side||15|
|Intel crams 100 GFLOPS of neural-net inferencing onto a USB stick||25|
|Toshiba's XG5 1TB NVMe SSD reviewed||6|
|Microsoft and Johnson Controls put Cortana in a thermostat||21|
|Space Exploration Day Shortbread||17|
|Geil de-blings its Evo Spear memory modules||12|
|Thermaltake View 21 chassis doubles up on tempered glass||5|
|Ah crap, if EUV stops being the technology that's always 5 years away from being real then I'll have to go back to Fusion.||+25|