This question has been nagging at me for a whileespecially tonight, as my inbox fills up with Microsoft security bulletins and reports have come in about MS's new project to get its programmers to write secure code.
This is the problem: Every time there's a bug in any sort of Microsoft software, we hear about it. A lot. Many of us hear it first from Microsoft via e-mail. Then maybe on CNN or a radio news report. Slashdot jumps on it with glee as yet another example of... something. And the rest of the web starts talking about it.
It happens all the time.
I can't think of another company whose software security problems get the constant, instant, deep, and wide exposure Microsoft's do. And every time it happens, Microsoft gets slammed for lousy security practices. Now, I know much of their software hasn't exactly been designed with security in mind from the ground up, but it seems odd to me that Microsoft is constantly getting beaten up for poor security practices right as it's in the midst of doing the right thing. Isn't that a little bit odd?
I dunno. I guess I should stop worrying about it and go patch some servers.
|1. BIF - $340||2. Ryu Connor - $250||3. mbutrovich - $250|
|4. YetAnotherGeek2 - $200||5. End User - $150||6. Captain Ned - $100|
|7. Anonymous Gerbil - $100||8. Bill Door - $100||9. ericfulmer - $100|
|10. dkanter - $100|
|AMD drops prices on the Radeon RX 460 and RX 470||15|
|Reports: Radeon RX 470D is a budget Polaris card for China||5|
|Examining reports of slow write speeds on the 32GB iPhone 7||19|
|Cellular Insights dissects iPhone 7 Plus modem performance||10|
|Deals of the week: scads of high-performance storage and more||8|
|Tobii's Eye Tracker 4C knows where your head is||0|
|GeForce driver 375.57 is prepared for Titanfall 2||6|
|Phanteks Eclipse P400 gets a tempered glass option||0|
|Radeon 16.10.2 drivers add support for October's big games||10|
|A real "console monitor" would be 720p @ 30 Hz ;P||+58|