How the Xabre stacks up, technologically, against the GF4 MX and Radeon 7500 is a little bit murkier now. Both the GeForce2 and Radeon (and hence the GF4 MX and Radeon 7500, in which the 3D bits are the same), included a a sort of proto-pixel shader capabilityNVIDIA called them register combinerswhich can handle some DX8-class effects. Also, both of those chips can use DX8's software vertex shaders as needed.
Still, SiS's choice here is logical, since emulating hardware pixel shaders in software isn't entirely possible, while software vertex shaders work pretty well. So the Xabre still looks like a compelling entry in the mid-to-low-range graphics market. Assuming even a fraction of the companies showing Xabre cards here actually brings those cards to market (and much depends on pressure from NVIDIA and ATI, frankly), little SiS's Xabre could prove pretty sharp. I've seen cards from Gainward, Biostar, Soyo, Triplex, and Gigabyte, among others.
|Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1060 graphics card reviewed||60|
|In the lab: EVGA's GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Superclocked graphics card||8|
|iPhone sales continue to shrivel in Apple's fiscal fourth quarter||15|
|Leaked MacBook Pro pics suggest OLED touch bar and Touch ID||16|
|Eizo FlexScan EV7280 monitor cuts cable clutter||6|
|Xiaomi reveals Mi Mix phone with a 6.4" edgeless display||32|
|Zotac and Thermaltake join forces for a liquid-cooled GTX 1080||4|
|Zotac Magnus EN1080 may be the fastest mini-PC yet||17|
|Seagate 5TB BarraCuda and 2TB FireCuda drives are big and speedy||37|
|Signing your posts is daftly redundant. Meadows||+29|