The web is slowly filling with Parheila reviews and commentary, and now even id Software's John Carmack has thrown his opinions into the mix. How will Parhelia fare in the new Doom game? Check Carmack's .plan file over at Shacknews.
The executive summary is that the Parhelia will run Doom, but it is not performance competitive with Nvidia or ATI.This echoes what the rest of the web seems to be concluding about Parhelia: it's just not a competitive high-end gaming card. What's even more interesting, however, is a little nugget at the end of the .plan file that reveals what could be a major shortcoming of higher-order surfaces:
Driver issue remain, so it is not perfect yet, but I am confident that Matrox will resolve them.
The performance was really disappointing for the first 256 bit DDR card. I tried to set up a "poster child" case that would stress the memory subsystem above and beyond any driver or triangle level inefficiencies, but I was unable to get it to ever approach the performance of a GF4.
In any case, we can't use any geometry amplification scheme (including ATI's truform) in conjunction with stencil shadow volumes.The Carmack has spoken; you may rise.
|Akitio Node Lite is a small aluminum home for PCIe devices||0|
|Radeon Pro Duo gets more energy-efficient with Polaris||9|
|Rumor: Intel Skylake-X and X299 will headline Computex 2017||56|
|Rumor: Nvidia to answer Radeon RX 550 with GeForce GT 1030||20|
|Samsung Galaxy Book tablets blend Windows 10 and Intel CPUs||17|
|Deals of the week: a mighty PSU, mid-range CPUs, and more||28|
|AMD board partners begin tricking out RX 560s and RX 550s||18|
|Dell shows off a pro-grade 4K HDR display and AIO machines||15|
|Rumor: Google to bake ad-blocking into Chrome browser||58|
|Those power consumption numbers are very fermi-liar||+54|