Ronald beat me to the punch and covered this story in the Shortbread, but it's too good not to blow up into a full post. TR reader Indeego sent in this link to a Merrill Lynch report on NVIDIA and its position after the NV30 announcement. The report has additional details on just when we'll be able to get our hands on the GeForce FX.
The first order of business for NVIDIA is to get NV30 off the ground. Though we picked up product specifics at the launch on Monday, we had a chance to get more detail on the timing of the ramp and remaining challenges yesterday. As expected, NVDIA has chosen not to use low-k dielectric on the NV-30, a decision which involves some performance compromises but also lowers the risk of any manufacturing miscues. With the part now qualified, waiting on system integrators to finish boards is the issue – that clearly is not going to happen until the April quarter.Though the two paragraphs fall directly after each other, they seem contradictory. While the first paragraph suggests that NV30 boards won't be available until the April quarter, the second indicates that a high-end NV3X part will be padding NVIDIA's revenues until then. What gives?
It will be very important for NVIDIA to successfully ramp the lower-cost versions of NV3X in time to hit the April 2003 quarter, however. The successful launch of the high-end part will not be enough to support a revenue upturn in the April quarter. Management was not willing to answer questions about whether additional versions of NV3X have taped out, although the intention to hit the April quarter was reiterated during our conversation.
My guess would be that Merrill Lynch has part designations mixed up in the first paragraph. We'll probably first see the GeForce FX as a high-end part only, likely with the Dustbuster, in the first quarter of 2003. Several months later, right around the April quarter, mid-range and low-end versions of the GeForce FX should become available.
A staggered release schedule makes sense, but NVIDIA is playing catch-up. ATI could stand to sell a whole lot of Radeon 9700s if NVIDIA's sole first quarter GeForce FX offering is a pricey high-end part. If NVIDIA is suffering from poor yields with the GeForce FX, it may be able to use binned GPUs in a slower, cheaper version of the GeForce FX based on the same board layout as the high-end part.
|Geil lights up its Evo X ROG-certified RAM||3|
|Google Compute Engine is now powered in part by Pascal||7|
|EVGA slaps 12 GT/s memory on the GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 Elite||13|
|G.Skill unleashes AMD-ready Trident Z RGB kits up to 3200 MT/s||12|
|Asus' ZenFone 4 Pro offers high-end photography and networking||19|
|Radeon 17.9.2 drivers put the pedal to the metal for Project Cars 2||4|
|ROG Strix X299-XE Gaming motherboard is rather groovy||4|
|Miniature Golf Day Shortbread||18|
|GeForce 385.69 drivers are Game Ready for a ton of titles||2|