Slate has an interesting article up that questions whether the popularity of Linux may hurt Apple more than it hurts Microsoft. The crux of the argument is that a free alternative like Linux, which runs on a wide variety of readily available cheap hardware, is a far more attractive alternative to Microsoft in trying economic times.
Apple does have a usability advantage of Linux, and OS X is undeniably sexy. However, as some Linux distributions look to emulate the Windows GUI and manufacturers sell budget systems with Linux pre-installed to eliminate hassles, fewer potential /switchers may be able to justify Apple's price premium.
It's important to note that Slate is owned by Microsoft. Still, the article makes some pretty compelling arguments for Linux taking over the number two spot on the desktop. Content creation professionals will no doubt flock to the new G5s, but will Apple's eMac and iMac lose out to much cheaper Linux-based alternatives?
|Acer sprinkles the Iconia Tab 10 with quantum dots||4|
|Deals of the week: lots of motherboards and a cheap GTX 1080||8|
|MSI Vortex G25VR, Infinite-A, and Pro 20EX PCs fill all niches||1|
|Nvidia unveils the GeForce GTX Battlebox certification program||16|
|Acer Spin 1 and Nitro 5 laptops are ready for school season||13|
|Ryzen AGESA 22.214.171.124 exposes more memory overclocking options||46|
|Zotac previews plenty of petite PCs for Computex 2017||7|
|Kingston KC1000 SSDs jump into the consumer NVMe space||5|
|Zotac readies a GTX 1080 Ti Mini and a slick external enclosure||24|