The guys at GamePC have benched up an intriguing comparison between Xeon and Opteron systems in web server and file server applications. The big dawgs are out to play, including the Opteron 248 and the Xeon 3.2GHz w/1MB cache.
I hate to nitpick with this kind of thing, but I am a little curious whether the CPU utilization percentage results they report in some of the tests are relevant. That is, does a pair of logical CPUs report its utilization in a way comparable to the utilization reported by a processor with a more traditional setup? I've seen dual Xeon systems where the two primary logical processors are pegged to the max (say with, heh, Folding), and the two secondary logical processors are idle. Both Xeons are actually quite busy, but the max CPU utilization reported doesn't go much past 50%, because two logical processors are unoccupied.
Anyhow, interesting article. Check it out.
|Examining reports of slow write speeds on the 32GB iPhone 7||12|
|Reports: Radeon RX 470D is a budget Polaris card for China||2|
|Cellular Insights dissects iPhone 7 Plus modem performance||9|
|Deals of the week: scads of high-performance storage and more||7|
|Tobii's Eye Tracker 4C knows where your head is||0|
|GeForce driver 375.57 is prepared for Titanfall 2||5|
|Phanteks Eclipse P400 gets a tempered glass option||0|
|Radeon 16.10.2 drivers add support for October's big games||10|
|Strong revenue doesn't stem red ink in AMD's fiscal third quarter||31|
|A real "console monitor" would be 720p @ 30 Hz ;P||+58|