Modern medicine is a wonder. One can go to the doctor with an ailment that would have been life-threatening 50 or 100 years ago, get a prescription, and be cured within a week. The applications of technology to solve health problems are staggeringly effective compared to what people used to know. Yet if a medical problem doesn't fall within the bounds of a known discipline or medical specialty, the contemporary medical approach too often breaks down. A patient may ping-pong among multiple specialists who seem to see only the common problems and indicators for which they are trained, at the expense of considering other factors ortoo often it seemsthe patient's whole health.
This situation has given rise to the realms of alternative and complementary medicine, where the modern approach is replaced or supplemented by a broader awareness of things like proper nutrition, exercise, skeletal alignment, traditional non-Western medicine, and the like.
Should modern medicine be more cross disciplinary? More "holistic"? Does medical training overemphasize memorization, pharmaceuticals, and technology at the expense of other important factors? Or are those outside the boundaries of the medical establishment all just quacks?
|AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X CPUs reviewed||63|
|Asus Vivobook Pro N580VD-DB74T can do offices and kids' parties||2|
|Thermaltake View 71 flaunts its glass on all angles||4|
|Deals of the week: mobos, CPUs, displays, and more||4|
|Alphacool HDX5 keeps a pair of M.2 SSDs cool||0|
|AMD weighs in on Radeon RX Vega pricing controversy||72|
|Intel expands its Atoms' radius with C3000 SoCs||46|
|Shuttle XH110G packs a PCIe x16 slot into a three-liter package||22|
|I Love My Feet Day Shortbread||17|
|Thanks Jeff, and congrats! Have a beer... and a nap.||+33|