IntelRambus’s largest and loudest supporterhas posted benchmarks on its site that basically prove what just about everybody already knows. Rambus RDRAM isn’t exactly the performer that some would lead us to believe. Here’s a quote from the Semiconductor Business News article:
In nine of 11 standard industry benchmarks the 815E/PC133 synchronous DRAM implementation beat out the 820/Rambus configuration for desktop PCs. The two chip sets and different memory formats were about equal in three of those tests, according to results on Intel's Web site.
Now, just for the sake of accuracy, these tests were preformed on 2 different chipsets. Nevertheless, it pretty much shows that RDRAM has quite a ways to go before it can truly compete on its own merits. I’d be really interested to see how a chipset with DDR support and 128MB of DDR-SDRAM would fare against either of these systems. You can check out the rest of the SBN articleincluding the benchmarks snagged from Intel’s siteover here.
|Alphacool Eiswolf 120 GPX-Pro takes the RX Vega to the pool||5|
|Deal of the day: a 144-Hz IPS FreeSync monitor for $400||25|
|The Tech Report's summer 2017 mobile staff picks||36|
|Go pro with the Asus ROG Strix XG27VQ gaming monitor||13|
|VivoBook W202NA is ready to brave the toughest of classrooms||6|
|MSI Infinite A desktops flaunt their gaming chops||14|
|Dual chambers and glass meet in the Lian Li PC-Q39||9|
|Razer Atheris is ready to strike on the move||14|
|Alphacool goes big with Eisbaer 420 AIO liquid cooler||6|
|I know you're joking but the numberpad is nothing more than a bad-habit crutch for hunt-and-peck, two-finger typists. Touch-typists don't even use it....||+16|