ATI picked today to unveil their new Radeon graphics cards, and the web-borne reviews are already out in force. Word is that Radeon cards are already shipping, so they should be available soon. You can have a look at reviews here:
All the reviews show the ATI beating the GF2 in 32-bit color, but not in 16-bit color. Why? The GF2 has more rendering pipelines, but the ATI is more efficient with memory bandwidth because of better Z-buffer management.
Oddly, most reviews seem to conclude the ATI is a bit slower overall, since the 16-bit color scores are lower. The FiringSquad ran more tests in 16-bits than in 32, then actually said the GF2 was faster "in a majority of our tests". Anand does an OK job, but he still has graphs with 16 and 32-bit color grouped together, with the sort order on the 16-bit color results.
So the ATI wins in every important performance test (i.e., who gives a rip about 16-bits?), but the GF2 comes out looking faster. Reader beware.
|Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1060 graphics card reviewed||58|
|In the lab: EVGA's GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Superclocked graphics card||7|
|iPhone sales continue to shrivel in Apple's fiscal fourth quarter||12|
|Leaked MacBook Pro pics suggest OLED touch bar and Touch ID||15|
|Eizo FlexScan EV7280 monitor cuts cable clutter||6|
|Xiaomi reveals Mi Mix phone with a 6.4" edgeless display||31|
|Zotac and Thermaltake join forces for a liquid-cooled GTX 1080||4|
|Zotac Magnus EN1080 may be the fastest mini-PC yet||17|
|Seagate 5TB BarraCuda and 2TB FireCuda drives are big and speedy||37|
|Signing your posts is daftly redundant. Meadows||+29|