For those with no desire to spend countless hours staring at the Raptor X's drive head dart back and forth across the platter, Western Digital makes the Raptor WD1500ADFD. This drive lacks a window, but otherwise, it's mechanically identical to the Raptor X—same spindle, cache, platters, and theoretically, performance. The WD1500ADFD also sells for roughly $50 less than the Raptor X, making it even more tempting for enthusiasts looking for a speedy storage upgrade.
Thanks to identical internals, we can expect the WD1500ADFD's performance to at least match that of the Raptor X. But how much faster are these Raptors than the best 7,200-RPM desktop drives on the market? Can they keep up with Seagate's latest perpendicular Barracuda 7200.10? Read on to find out.
Although the Raptor X is clearly designed for PC enthusiasts, Western Digital has always pushed its other Raptors as enterprise drives for servers and workstations—not that enthusiasts have had a problem ignoring the arbitrary product segmentation. For enthusiasts, the Raptor WD1500ADFD really sells itself. Western Digital has made it clear that little more than a window separates the drive from the Raptor X, and both are much improved over the previous WD740GD.
|Raptor WD1500ADFD||Raptor WD740GD|
|Maximum external transfer rate||150MB/s|
|Maximum internal transfer rate||84MB/s||72MB/s|
|Read seek time||4.6ms||4.5ms|
|Write seek time||5.2ms||5.9ms|
|Average rotational latency||2.99ms|
|Idle power consumption||9.19W||8.40W|
|Read/write power consumption||10.02W||7.90W|
|Warranty length||Five years|
Since the original, the Raptor's biggest handicap has been limited storage capacity. Even the WD740GD's 74 GB capacity proved too limited for many, but Western Digital has managed to squeeze 150 GB into the WD1500ADFD. That size obviously isn't all that impressive next to the half-terabyte and higher capacities offered by today's beefiest drives, but it should be enough for most folks, if only as an OS and applications drive.
Denser platters allow the WD1500ADFD to offer a greater storage capacity than the previous generation Raptor. A higher areal density should also improve performance by allowing the drive head to access more data in the same physical area.
The new Raptor has other performance perks, as well. Western Digital has doubled the drive's cache to 16 MB and ditched its obscure Tagged Command Queuing implementation in favor of the more widely supported Native Command Queuing.
Support for 300 MB/s Serial ATA transfer rates, however, is conspicuously missing from the WD1500ADFD. When it first released these new Raptors, Western Digital candidly admitted that its 300 MB/s Serial ATA implementation wasn't yet ready to interoperate correctly with all if the various SATA disk controllers on the market. With an enterprise-class drive like the WD1500ADFD, reliability was a greater priority than support for this feature. We have yet to see real-world applications really benefit from 300 MB/s Serial ATA transfer rates, anyway. In fact, some drive manufacturers have started shipping 300 MB/s drives in 150 MB/s mode to avoid compatibility problems with certain chipsets.
Western Digital covers the Raptor WD1500ADFD with a five-year warranty. That nicely matches the warranty coverage typically offered with enterprise-class SCSI drives, although it's somewhat less notable now that Seagate offers a five-year warranty on all its internal hard drives, including desktop models.
|Acer's Aspire GX-281 lineup brings Ryzen to the masses||7|
|Galax and KFA2 induct the GTX 1080 Ti into the Hall of Fame||9|
|Deals of the week: discounts on CPUs, mobos, and more||4|
|Asetek gets $600,000 from Cooler Master in AIO cooler patent spat||7|
|Acer Predator Triton and Helios laptops are ready for serious play||5|
|Intel enjoys healthy revenue and profits for Q1 2017||27|
|Acer Predator X27 and Predator Z271UV displays report in||16|
|Razer Lancehead wireless mouse is ready to stalk its prey||5|
|Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day Shortbread||14|
|Unless Intel suddenly becomes very aggressive in its pricing, a Skylake-X will certainly cost a hell of a lot more than Ryzen CPU. And who cares if AM...||+63|