Single page Print

Conclusions
I'm still not sure how I feel about the NIA. On one hand, the device has undeniable potential, and I could see it becoming popular if OCZ refined the concept and improved usability. I can certainly understand the appeal, even if I don't particularly feel like practicing for weeks and spending hours fashioning complicated control schemes—Schuette even suggests making separate schemes for different maps in the same game.

On the flip side, the current implementation didn't really woo me, and it raises all kinds of questions about whether more exotic control schemes are really the best direction for PC gaming. Unless you're Fatal1ty, you probably don't care too much about shaving 100 ms off your reaction times, and you probably have plenty of fun with your mouse and keyboard, gamepad, or Wii-mote already. If it ain't broke, why fix it?

Well, I suppose that kind of thinking doesn't really foster innovation, and I do commend OCZ for at least trying something new instead of looking for more ways to dress up a conventional mouse. The NIA needs a good amount of extra polish before I can recommend it to everyone, though.

We take a seat on Turris' VR ChairYou spin it round like a record 24
G.Skill's Ripjaws MX780 RGB gaming mouse reviewedA rodent for all 22
Aorus' X3 Plus v5 gaming laptop reviewedPint-sized and potent 47
Tobii's EyeX eye-tracking controller reviewedIt can't see my face as well as yours, but I tried it 26
TR's March 2016 peripheral staff picksThe best monitors, keyboards, mice, and more 66
Cooler Master's MasterKeys Pro L and Pro S keyboards reviewedTwo of a kind 31
XCOM 2 reviewed: hit the ground running and never stopTurning the pace up to eleven and then some 52
Robotic vacuums: a PC enthusiast's primerIt's not about the Pentiums, baby 50