Single page Print

Conclusions
I'm still not sure how I feel about the NIA. On one hand, the device has undeniable potential, and I could see it becoming popular if OCZ refined the concept and improved usability. I can certainly understand the appeal, even if I don't particularly feel like practicing for weeks and spending hours fashioning complicated control schemes—Schuette even suggests making separate schemes for different maps in the same game.

On the flip side, the current implementation didn't really woo me, and it raises all kinds of questions about whether more exotic control schemes are really the best direction for PC gaming. Unless you're Fatal1ty, you probably don't care too much about shaving 100 ms off your reaction times, and you probably have plenty of fun with your mouse and keyboard, gamepad, or Wii-mote already. If it ain't broke, why fix it?

Well, I suppose that kind of thinking doesn't really foster innovation, and I do commend OCZ for at least trying something new instead of looking for more ways to dress up a conventional mouse. The NIA needs a good amount of extra polish before I can recommend it to everyone, though.

 
Fatal1ty by Monster's FXM 200 gaming headset reviewedClassy cans with a gaming bent 27
Zalman's ZM-K900M RGB LED gaming keyboard reviewedA simple shell with complex guts 10
The Tech Report's 2016 Christmas gift guide We pick the right gifts for the nerd on your list 28
Rosewill's RK-9000V2 RGB mechanical keyboard reviewedLook, ma, no apps 16
MadCatz's RAT 1 gaming mouse reviewedEntry-level in a premium market 27
A technology overview of the Aimpad R5 analog keyboardDead zones? We don't need no stinkin' dead zones! 24
TR's October 2016 peripheral staff picksThe only thing that's changed is everything 81
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided reviewedThe next augmentation in a classic series 47