WorldBench uses scripting to step through a series of tasks in common Windows applications. It then produces an overall score. WorldBench also spits out individual results for its component application tests, allowing us to compare performance in each. We'll look at the overall score, and then we'll show individual application results.
Boot and load times
To test system boot and game level load times, we busted out our trusty stopwatch.
File Copy Test
File Copy Test is a pseudo-real-world benchmark that times how long it takes to create, read, and copy files in various test patterns. File copying is tested twice: once with the source and target on the same partition, and once with the target on a separate partition. Scores are presented in MB/s.
To make things easier to read, we've separated our FC-Test results into individual graphs for each test pattern. We'll tackle file creation performance first.
We've developed a series of disk-intensive multitasking tests to highlight the impact of seek times and command queuing on hard drive performance. You can get the low-down on these iPEAK-based tests here. The mean service time of each drive is reported in milliseconds, with lower values representing better performance.
IOMeter presents a good test case for both seek times and command queuing.
We tested HD Tach with the benchmark's full variable zone size setting.
Noise levels were measured with an Extech 407727 Digital Sound Level meter 1" from the side of the drives at idle and under an HD Tach seek load. Drives were run with the PCB facing up.
For our power consumption tests, we measured the voltage drop across a 0.1-ohm resistor placed in line with the 5V and 12V lines connected to each drive. Through the magic of Ohm's Law, we were able to calculate the power draw from each voltage rail and add them together for the total power draw of the drive.
52 comments — Last by issa2000 at 7:25 AM on 01/25/09
|Computex 2017: Adata goes all-in on M.2 SSDsGumsticks galore||17|
|Corsair's Force Series MP500 240GB NVMe SSD reviewedAnother NVMe challenger girds itself with 15-nm MLC||39|
|The Tech Report System Guide: May 2017 editionRyzen 5 takes the stage||111|
|Intel's 32GB Optane Memory storage accelerator reviewed3D Xpoint offers a helping hand to hard drives||135|
|Intel gives hard drives a boost with Optane MemoryTaking another crack at storage caching||84|
|Intel Optane SSD DC P4800X opens new frontiers in datacenter storage3D Xpoint bridges DRAM and NAND||70|
|Patriot's Hellfire 480GB NVMe SSD reviewedThe NVMe competition heats up||22|
|Samsung's 960 EVO SSD reviewedMore affordable NVMe magic||37|
|Ryzen Pro platform brings a dash of Epyc to corporate desktops||2|
|Corsair's Hydro GFX GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card reviewed||7|
|Qualcomm hides a fingerprint scanner under your screen||11|
|Toshiba prepares a 96-layer 3D NAND parfait||15|
|Baidu's DeepBench can now measure inference performance||8|
|Toshiba QLC 3D NAND squeezes a fourth bit into flash cells||24|
|Microsoft resurrects EMET to improve Windows 10 security||7|
|Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 returns as the Fandom Edition||20|
|European Commission fines Google $2.7 bn over Shopping results||81|
|So they're part of a fire sale?||+36|