WorldBench uses scripting to step through a series of tasks in common Windows applications. It then produces an overall score. WorldBench also spits out individual results for its component application tests, allowing us to compare performance in each. We'll look at the overall score, and then we'll show individual application results.
Boot and load times
To test system boot and game level load times, we busted out our trusty stopwatch.
File Copy Test
File Copy Test is a pseudo-real-world benchmark that times how long it takes to create, read, and copy files in various test patterns. File copying is tested twice: once with the source and target on the same partition, and once with the target on a separate partition. Scores are presented in MB/s.
To make things easier to read, we've separated our FC-Test results into individual graphs for each test pattern. We'll tackle file creation performance first.
We've developed a series of disk-intensive multitasking tests to highlight the impact of seek times and command queuing on hard drive performance. You can get the low-down on these iPEAK-based tests here. The mean service time of each drive is reported in milliseconds, with lower values representing better performance.
IOMeter presents a good test case for both seek times and command queuing.
We tested HD Tach with the benchmark's full variable zone size setting.
Noise levels were measured with an Extech 407727 Digital Sound Level meter 1" from the side of the drives at idle and under an HD Tach seek load. Drives were run with the PCB facing up.
For our power consumption tests, we measured the voltage drop across a 0.1-ohm resistor placed in line with the 5V and 12V lines connected to each drive. Through the magic of Ohm's Law, we were able to calculate the power draw from each voltage rail and add them together for the total power draw of the drive.
52 comments — Last by issa2000 at 7:25 AM on 01/25/09
|Some 840 EVOs still vulnerable to read speed slowdownsPatched drives exhibit problems with old data||92|
|Samsung's Portable SSD T1 reviewedA pocketable 850 EVO||34|
|Samsung's 850 EVO solid-state drive reviewed3D V-NAND's destiny||56|
|The SSD Endurance Experiment: Two freaking petabytesThe survivors soldier on to another really big number||60|
|Corsair's Neutron Series XT solid-state drive reviewedMy SSD controller has more cores than yours||24|
|Samsung's 840 EVO update fixes slow reads with old dataAn early look at the EVO's Performance Restoration tool||28|
|Micron's M600 solid-state drive reviewedA truly dynamic SLC/MLC hybrid||24|
|The SSD Endurance Experiment: Only two remain after 1.5PBAnother one bites the dust||76|
|We discuss the GeForce GTX 970 memory controversy||27|
|WSJ: Microsoft to back Cyanogen with $70M investment||38|
|You've goat to check out Silicon Power's new thumb drive||47|
|The TR Podcast 169 video: Win10, Elon's musk, and the gimpy GTX 970||0|
|In the lab: Dell's Venue 8 7000 tablet||28|
|Qualcomm posts record revenue, loses high-profile design||20|
|Intel refreshes high-endurance server SSDs with 20-nm NAND||15|
|The TR Podcast is live on Twitch right now||1|