We've now had a look at AMD's first response to Nehalem, and well, it's not bad. The six-core Opteron 2345 can't quite match the Xeon X5550 in overall performanceand although these products are nearly the same price, the Xeon X5550 isn't the highest Nehalem speed grade. That honor would fall to the Xeon W5580 processor that appeared in some of our benchmark results. In terms of raw performance in a 2P system, Nehalem still reigns supreme.
Yet Istanbul should be a clear improvement over Shanghai for many workstation-class workloads and most server-class workloadsi.e., those that are essentially parallel and widely multithreaded. The Opteron 2435 manages to deliver this higher performance not just within the same power envelopes, but quite empirically with almost the exact same measured power consumption as the Opteron 2389.
This combination yields a nice increase in power efficiency, which was enough to put our Istanbul-based test system in the same territory as our Xeon X5550 system. The competition between the two was remarkably close in SPECpower_ssj, and the Istanbul system required notably less energy to render the Cinema 4D sample scene in Cinebench. So despite that fact that Intel leads in outright performance, the Opteron 2435 is entirely competitive on the power-efficiency front, with lower peak power draw, to boot. Those who evaluate systems strictly on this basis would do well to keep Opterons in the mix.
And if you have existing, compatible Socket F servers, the Istanbul Opterons should be an excellent drop-in upgrade. They're a no-brainer, really, when one considers energy costs and per-socket/per-server software licensing fees.
AMD has a tougher sell to make when it comes to brand-new systems. The Nehalem Xeons offer higher peak performance with a similar energy-efficiency proposition. Still, Istanbul at least keeps the Opteron in the conversation, which makes the outlook for AMD seem substantially less apocalyptic than it did several short months ago.
114 comments — Last by pluscard at 9:35 PM on 06/13/09
|AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X CPUs reviewedI'm rubber, you're glue||108|
|AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, Threadripper 1920X, and Threadripper 1900X CPUs revealedAMD returns to the high-end desktop||109|
|AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPUs reviewedZen for everyone||122|
|Ryzen Pro platform brings a dash of Epyc to corporate desktopsZen puts on a suit and tie||28|
|AMD's Epyc 7000-series CPUs revealed Zen gets its data center marching orders||157|
|Intel's Core i9-7900X CPU reviewed, part oneVying for a perfect 10||169|
|AMD's Ryzen 5 CPUs reviewed, part twoGetting down to business||171|
|Intel's Core X-series CPUs and X299 platform revealedSkylake-X and Kaby Lake-X make their debut||245|
|AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X CPUs reviewed||108|
|Asus Vivobook Pro N580VD-DB74T can do offices and kids' parties||13|
|Thermaltake View 71 flaunts its glass on all angles||6|
|Deals of the week: mobos, CPUs, displays, and more||6|
|Alphacool HDX5 keeps a pair of M.2 SSDs cool||0|
|AMD weighs in on Radeon RX Vega pricing controversy||84|
|Intel expands its Atoms' radius with C3000 SoCs||50|
|Shuttle XH110G packs a PCIe x16 slot into a three-liter package||22|
|I Love My Feet Day Shortbread||17|
|Thanks Jeff, and congrats! Have a beer... and a nap.||+38|