We've now had a look at AMD's first response to Nehalem, and well, it's not bad. The six-core Opteron 2345 can't quite match the Xeon X5550 in overall performanceand although these products are nearly the same price, the Xeon X5550 isn't the highest Nehalem speed grade. That honor would fall to the Xeon W5580 processor that appeared in some of our benchmark results. In terms of raw performance in a 2P system, Nehalem still reigns supreme.
Yet Istanbul should be a clear improvement over Shanghai for many workstation-class workloads and most server-class workloadsi.e., those that are essentially parallel and widely multithreaded. The Opteron 2435 manages to deliver this higher performance not just within the same power envelopes, but quite empirically with almost the exact same measured power consumption as the Opteron 2389.
This combination yields a nice increase in power efficiency, which was enough to put our Istanbul-based test system in the same territory as our Xeon X5550 system. The competition between the two was remarkably close in SPECpower_ssj, and the Istanbul system required notably less energy to render the Cinema 4D sample scene in Cinebench. So despite that fact that Intel leads in outright performance, the Opteron 2435 is entirely competitive on the power-efficiency front, with lower peak power draw, to boot. Those who evaluate systems strictly on this basis would do well to keep Opterons in the mix.
And if you have existing, compatible Socket F servers, the Istanbul Opterons should be an excellent drop-in upgrade. They're a no-brainer, really, when one considers energy costs and per-socket/per-server software licensing fees.
AMD has a tougher sell to make when it comes to brand-new systems. The Nehalem Xeons offer higher peak performance with a similar energy-efficiency proposition. Still, Istanbul at least keeps the Opteron in the conversation, which makes the outlook for AMD seem substantially less apocalyptic than it did several short months ago.
114 comments — Last by pluscard at 9:35 PM on 06/13/09
|AMD's Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 1500X CPUs reviewed, part oneGetting our game on||183|
|A moment of Zen with David Kanter: The TR Podcast 190Digging into the whys of Ryzen||36|
|Intel defends its process-technology leadership at 14nm and 10nmWhat's in a number?||111|
|AMD's Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X, and Ryzen 7 1700 CPUs reviewedRyzen up, back on the street||711|
|A Bridge too far: migrating from Sandy to Kaby LakeA Core i7-7700K and Asus Z270-A upgrade story||160|
|Intel's Core i7-7700K 'Kaby Lake' CPU reviewedHeavy lies the crown||175|
|AMD crests Summit Ridge with Ryzen CPUsRyzen shine||367|
|AMD unwraps its seventh-generation desktop APUs and AM4 platformPaving the way for Zen||81|
|Rumor: Intel Skylake-X and X299 will headline Computex 2017||51|
|Rumor: Nvidia to answer Radeon RX 550 with GeForce GT 1030||17|
|Samsung Galaxy Book tablets blend Windows 10 and Intel CPUs||16|
|Deals of the week: a mighty PSU, mid-range CPUs, and more||27|
|AMD board partners begin tricking out RX 560s and RX 550s||16|
|Dell shows off a pro-grade 4K HDR display and AIO machines||15|
|Rumor: Google to bake ad-blocking into Chrome browser||53|
|EpicGear's Defiant modular gaming keyboard reviewed||12|
|GeForce cards with faster RAM are inbound from multiple locations||19|
|Those power consumption numbers are very fermi-liar||+53|