The sun is shining. You can hear the faint sound of lawnmowers off in the distance. It's summer... time for a new TR system guide.
Aside from a few new processors, most notably AMD's dual-core Phenom II derivatives, we haven't seen a whole lot of new hardware come out since our April guide. However, the combination of those few launches and sinking prices has allowed us to reshape our $500 Econobox and $800 Utility Player builds quite considerably. No, really. The former now has an unlocked, dual-core Phenom II and DDR3 RAM, while the latter now sports a speedy quad-core processor.
Our Sweeter Spot and Double-Stuff Workstation have been updated, as well, and we've added a fifth configuration: the Pocket Swiss Army Knife. This latest addition is teeny Mini-ITX system with a dual-core Pentium processor and enough expansion capacity to become a compact, low-power gaming rig, a little home-theater PC, or the world's smallest quad-core box. Keep reading for all the juicy details.
Rules and regulations
The first thing you should know about this guide is that it's geared toward helping you select the parts for a home-built PC. If you're new to building your own systems and want a little extra help, our tutorial on how to build your own PC is a great place to start and a helpful complement to this guide.
Before tackling our recommended systems, we should explain some of the rules and guidelines we used to select components. The guiding philosophy behind our choices was to seek the best bang for the buck. That means we avoided recommending super-cheap parts that are barely capable of performing their jobs, just as we generally avoided breathtakingly expensive products that carry a hefty price premium for features or performance you probably don't need. Instead, we looked to that mythical "sweet spot" where price and performance meet up in a pleasant, harmonic convergence. We also sought balance within each system configuration, choosing components that make sense together, so that a fast processor won't be bottlenecked by a skimpy graphics card or too little system memory, for instance. The end result, we hope, is a series of balanced systems that offer decent performance as configured and provide ample room for future expandability.
We confined our selections to components that are currently available online. Paper launches and preorders don't count, for obvious reasons. We also tried to stick to $500, $800 and $1200 budgets for our three cheapest desktop systems. Those budgets are loose guidelines rather than hard limits, to allow us some wiggle room for deals that may stretch the budget a little but are too good to resist.
We've continued our tradition of basing the guide's component prices on listings at Newegg. We've found that sourcing prices from one large reseller allows us to maintain a more realistic sense of street prices than price search engine listings, which are sometimes artificially low. In the few cases where Newegg doesn't have an item in stock, we'll fall back to our trusty price search engine rather than limit our options.
Finally, price wasn't the top factor in our component choices. Our own experiences with individual components weighed heavily on our decisions, and we've provided links to our own reviews of many of the products we're recommending. We've also tried to confine our selections to name-brand rather than generic products, and to manufacturers with solid reputations for reliability. Warranty coverage was an important consideration, as well.
|ASRock's latest X99 board turns onboard networking up to 22Gbps||12|
|Just Cause 3 won't have multiplayer at launch||6|
|Samsung asks ITC to block Nvidia GPU shipments||27|
|The TR Podcast 166 is now available on YouTube||23|
|Chromebooks now come with 1TB of cloud storage for two years||30|
|Deal of the week: Devil's Canyon starting at $179.99, Intel 730 Series for $0.42/GB, and more||38|
|AMD prolongs A-series software deal; price cuts still a work in progress||25|
|Report: Valve lays out new rules for Early Access games||61|
|Sounds like a good way to conceal the terrible financial performance of the mobile business unit.||+36|